advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

How Victoria’s Secret, Nordstrom Came To Opposite Decisions

May 21st, 2013

Nordstrom has had its mastectomy bra program running for an impressive 35 years and has fulltime associates who are fully trained and certified. “Our prosthesis bra offering and fitting service is a successful part of our lingerie business and we’re pleased to offer it to our customers. For us, it seems like a natural connection to offer this service to our customers, many of whom are impacted by breast cancer,” said Nordstrom spokesperson Tara Darrow. “We want to do what we can to provide them with the same level of personal service, product selection and knowledge during their prosthesis and bra fitting that they expect in a regular fitting. We offer certified prosthesis fitting in every Nordstrom full-line store and we believe we offer the single largest network of certified mastectomy fitters in the country.”

The ROI of any program like this is complicated. From a pure direct cost versus direct benefit perspective, Nordstrom’s long history of this program means that the special costs were absorbed long ago. The associates at Victoria’s Secret tend to be much younger and having a higher turnover than their Nordstrom counterparts. Much more important are the demographics of each chain’s shoppers. The much younger profile of VS shoppers means fewer customers likely to be directly suffering breast cancer, compared with the older profile at Nordstrom.

That age difference with the shoppers also impacts productivity issues. Would there be enough mastectomy bra shoppers to keep one specialist at each store busy? When there is no need, would that highly-trained technician likely be willing and able to sell random VS merchandise when there’s no mastectomy bra customers needing help?

The larger average ticket size at Nordstrom also allows such investments to be recouped much more quickly. Most critically, the benefit of such a program is not the revenue from the mastectomy bra sale per se, but the loyalty of that customer and untold future repeat purchases. Indeed, the bra prices at both chains is not that different, said Nordstrom’s Darrow: “We are actually competitive with Victoria’s Secret on price. Our bras range from $38 to $86.”

Not all such fittings actually deliver a true prosthesis bra. Often Nordstrom can sell the shopper an off-the-shelf bra and then add special pockets to the garment, something that Nordstrom offers at no additional charge. “For us, it’s really about providing a service for our customers. We offer bra fittings as well, so this is really a nature extension of that service. Our customers tell us they love that we can do this for them,” Darrow said. “We think it makes sense to provide service to our customers in many ways and at during different points in their lives. Through offering prosthesis bras and fittings, we do hope that we can meet our customers’ needs now and hopefully bring them back to our store in the future so we can serve them again. Or for current customers, we can continue to meet their needs. We believe this personalized service–particularly at what can be a difficult time for many women—sets us apart.”

The fact that Nordstrom has always made customer service a top priority—making it one of the most CS-friendly chains in retail—also makes this service a good match.

Clearly, both of these chains have made these decisions based on business criteria (profit). Even the charitable investments can be cynically seen as a marketing effort. But both chains have also seemingly come to opposite decisions based on what they argue is in the best interest of their customers. The reality is that one chain’s demographics and positioning allows it offer this service well and the other chain associates and shoppers make it unable to deliver such a service well.

Petitions or not, it’s clear that these kinds of retail decisions are lot more complex than they might first appear.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.