advertisement
advertisement

Best Buy Yanks E-mail Support From Its Site. Shoppers May Be Better Off

Written by Evan Schuman
December 12th, 2012

Best Buy last week removed E-mail support from its Web site, a move the company said was designed to improve response and to give customers the kind of interactions they seek. The problem with this change is twofold. First, there is a powerful efficiency that E-mail exchanges offer, with the customer able to spell out the exact problem/question with all of the details and then send it without waiting on hold or waiting for a chat session to start. The chain can then respond hours later and the customer can do something else while waiting.

The second problem is that Best Buy Chat is often not available and shoppers are met with a pop-up saying “Sorry, no Best Buy chat representatives are currently available. Our chat representatives are currently helping other customers. Please call us at 1-877-xxx-xxxx instead.” If the chat is that busy, how long will the hold time likely be? Kind of makes an E-mail option look attractive, no?

Last week’s removal of the E-mail option was first reported by Happy Customer.

Shoppers simply want as many communication options as possible, provided they work reasonably well. The Consumerist did a piece last Wednesday (Dec. 5) about cryptic E-mail responses from Best Buy. *Sigh* If E-mail responses are slow, rarely happen or are non-responsive to the questions, is it better to fix that situation or halt the access?

When we tried instant chat with Best Buy on Wednesday (Dec. 12), it took several attempts to get through. Once through, we had a good conversation with the associate. At the end of the discussion, a survey form popped up. And that survey form obliterated our chat transcript. Oh well.

All in all, Best Buy’s handling of this is still better than our classic favorite of customer communication disasters: Walmart five years ago continued customer phone support but tried to cut down on calls by hiding the number, saying that it preferred to call customers back. At least we were able to run the headline “Walmart to Customers: Don’t Call Us. We’ll Call You.”

Another generic problem with chat is that many chains have chat support people simultaneously manage several conversations, which causes this odd “Are you still there? Hello?” sensation when the rep suddenly stops participating for several minutes.

To Best Buy’s credit, if it believed that it couldn’t adequately support E-mail, it was wise to kill it. If E-mails are being ignored, best to halt that form of communication. Research from Happy Customer, for example, found that Best Buy only responded to 15 percent of its Black Friday E-mails this year.

During the holiday insanity, it can be hard to be responsive to all inquiries, but it seems odd to shut down E-mail, as that is the most forgiving communication method. If you’re two minutes late responding to a text, it seems to the shopper like it’s forever, as does a five-minute delay answering a call center phone call. But your team can be three hours late replying to an E-mail and it will be most satisfactory to most shoppers—assuming the response is indeed responsiveness and helpful.

And maybe that last part is the real issue after all.


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.