advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

CMOs Should Watch “Revenge Of The Nerds” And “Real Genius”

April 30th, 2013

It was just a few years ago when retail customers were very opaque. We knew very little about them unless they were a member of a loyalty program. The paradigm has shifted to an avalanche of data that is available for marketers to access and use.

  • Would you like to track every Web page that a person visits when they come to your website and every email link they’ve ever clicked on? Easy.
  • Would you like to enhance your customer profiles with third-party demographic information? Not a problem.
  • Would you like to scrape social networking sites like Facebook, Twitter, Foursquare and Yelp to find out what they really think? Coming right up.
  • Would you like to know when a customer comes within a certain radius of your store locations, or even where they are standing in your stores? It shall be done.
  • Would you like to analyze their smartphone to get an idea for where they work and what they are interested in? Just insert this small piece of code..
  • Would you like to integrate all this data with their purchase history? I thought you’d never ask!

    One of my favorite quotes from The Filter Bubble was taken from Andrew Lewis on MetaFilter: “If you’re not paying for something, you’re not the customer. You’re the product being sold.” Consumers, as part of our everyday lives, are pushing “click to accept” on free mobile apps, Web services and loyalty cards. Most of us know deep down that there is no such thing as a free lunch, but at what point does this start to generate backlash? When marketers start to take it too far.

    We’ve all seen an ad (or a lot more) that we can’t seem to shake for days or weeks after visiting a website. Or, as one of my friends calls it, “Companies stalking me around the Web.” Display ad retargeting must be showing a strong ROI, because more and more companies are doing it. I’m sure that the marketer felt that messaging a consumer about a product or service that someone just looked at on their website felt like a good way to be relevant (they’ve shown interest), but may have gone a little overboard. Do you really want your brand to be known as a “stalker”?

    But just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should do something. For years, grocery chains have known about new additions to the family when they see loyalty card members suddenly start to purchase diapers on a regular basis. But most refrain from freaking you out by sending you a “Congratulations on your new bundle of joy!“ card.

    Of course, we can’t forget about the policy makers who are also making moves. In February, the FTC released a set of guidelines for mobile privacy policies. Last year the European Union updated a 22-year-old consumer privacy law by releasing the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) aimed at protecting their citizens’ privacy rights with companies operating outside of the EU.

    But how does a CMO determine where that line is?


  • advertisement

    Comments are closed.

    Newsletters

    StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
    advertisement

    Most Recent Comments

    Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

    I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
    Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
    A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
    The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
    @David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

    StorefrontBacktalk
    Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.