advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

Does Rakuten’s Move Mean E-Tailers Should Re-Think Web Design?

Written by Evan Schuman
June 10th, 2013

When global e-tailer Rakuten told IRCE attendees last week of its plans to more aggressively push into the U.S. market later this summer, it spoke of its differences with Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) and specifically stressed its preference for much longer pages than is the U.S. online norm.

Have times—and shoppers’ preferences—changed so much that a complete reversal is a wise move? Should e-tailers (including Amazon) be rethinking their fundamental Web design strategies? Has this $4.7 billion global retailer—operating in 27 countries—figured out something that others haven’t?

The argument really comes to a simple choice: scrolling versus clicking.

The argument for clicking is that it makes for a cleaner and shorter page and that all of the additional detail is there, but it’s not cluttering up the page until the shopper wants to see it. There might be a link for technical specs, but those numbers will only appear when it’s clicked on. No need to distract the reader who doesn’t care about those specs.

The argument for scrolling (or using a lot of the PageDown button) is user apathy or lack of awareness. If the shopper truly thinks the product is complicated, that shopper would have no interest in clicking the demo button. But if that really simple demo just autoplays, it might persuade the exact shoppers who would have never been likely to click.

The other key part of this debate is shopper desires/expectations. A lot of these minimalistic page design strategies—best exemplified by famed design guru Jakob Nielsen—were first championed back in the mid-1990s, when E-Commerce began, almost 20 years ago. Have shopper expectations changed radically in that timeframe, fueled by dramatically faster bandwidth and machine speeds? Or will the desire to not be overwhelmed not change with the years?

To try and figure this out, reached out to Jakob Nielsen himself, who connected us with the interface design director of his group, Amy Schade. Schade argued that bandwidth and machine changes are helpful, but that “people’s behavior doesn’t really change that much. A long scroll is still going to be overwhelming to a user, if it doesn’t make sense for that page. It’s information overload.”


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.