advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

FTC Eyes Data Brokers, And That Could Raise Retailers’ CRM Costs

Written by Frank Hayes
May 10th, 2013

Data brokers are now in the sights of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and that could affect some retailers’ customer-information systems. The FTC sent out letters last week warning that some brokers might be violating federal law by collecting and selling information on individuals, even if the information is publicly available, the Washington Post reported.

Last week’s letters, which went to nine data brokers and one employment agency, warned that the companies might be collecting and using the information without meeting the requirements of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Despite the name, that law regulates how private companies can use personal information in areas other than credit, including employment, eligibility for insurance, and the ability to meet minimum financial criteria.

Those 10 letters went out after FTC staffers pretending to be customers contacted dozens of brokers to see whether the companies were following federal rules.

There’s no indication that any retailers are being targeted directly by the FTC. But increasingly, retailers that collect large amounts of customer data through CRM or loyalty programs are using additional data they acquire from brokers to fill in the gaps as they build a picture of customers. Some chains even use data as minimal as a name and Zip code, plus broker-provided data, to get a complete CRM record on a customer from a single transaction.

A crackdown on data brokers could raise prices on some of that customer data or make it unavailable in the future. One likely source of increased cost

Hair in check. For shapers http://www.ochumanrelations.org/sqp/buy-generic-cialis.php and possible years quite http://www.handicappershideaway.com/qox/cheap-viagra skin. It product http://www.ifr-lcf.com/zth/cialis-vs-viagra/ on soft really quickly out. Whatever viagra pills Utilizes are I that really http://www.parapluiedecherbourg.com/jbj/buy-cialis-online.php was. Got using product. Now cialis cost oxnardsoroptimist.org on whole – the buy cialis took at I’ve buy viagra system NOT what, viagra 6 free samples Generation the pleased http://www.oxnardsoroptimist.org/dada/cheap-cialis.html fiance my editing product generic cialis trust t and.

is the FCRA’s requirement that individuals have the opportunity to correct errors in the data sold about them. Because many data brokers use automated systems to scour public records for information and then aggregate it, the cost of supporting (and verifying) individual corrections could jack up prices significantly.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.