advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Japan’s Rakuten Prepares To Enter The U.S.—And Amazon Prepares To Greet Them

June 5th, 2013

Rakuten’s philosophy is the opposite, creating a site that Bernard Luthi, the COO for Rakuten.com Shopping (that was Buy.com before Rakuten bought and rebranded it), said was one designed for shopping, not necessarily buying and certainly not necessarily buying right now.

Rakuten’s approach therefore places an emphasis on storytelling, including features about the product and how it’s grown or manufactured. And in a move that design-wise is radically different from many major U.S. sites, the company wants very long pages, with lots of video and pictures and elements. They prefer to have shoppers scrolling than clicking. (Here’s a sample Rakuten page.)

Will this likely give Amazon a reason to worry, given how much importance it places on its marketplace? That could truly go either way—and that really should worry Amazon.

The best argument in favor of Rakuten faring well in the U.S. is that a very large number of Amazon sellers are quite angry with Amazon’s policies. The best argument in favor of Amazon emerging mostly unscathed? Those sellers generally make better dollars from Amazon than they can anywhere else. Being upset with Amazon is one thing: alienating the cash cow is quite another.

Some merchants might want to try selling on both platforms, but Amazon could easily crack down on its rules, forcing merchants to make a choice. Amazon knows that if it forces such a choice soon—before Rakuten has a chance to attract a lot of American shoppers—it will fare well.

Today, the U.S. Rakuten site has about 3,000 U.S. merchants, COO Luthi said, but almost all of them were simply the old Buy.com merchants. He said the real fireworks are likely to start in mid-August when the site will run a “super sale,” which he described as a week-long Black Friday.

Amazon has would have the option of fighting back by sweetening its marketplace contracts and procedures (and even money). One move that would quiet resentment would be agreeing to let merchants permanently own categories and then allowing them to more prominently promote themselves in the Amazon listings.

Rakuten has said that it would give its merchants access to email addresses and other information about its shoppers, something that Amazon has been hesitant to do. (Example: StorefrontBacktalk has no idea who subscribes to the Amazon Kindle version of StorefrontBacktalk. We know the numberof subscribers, but that’s it.)

From the global competitive perspective, Amazon is well entrenched and has many ways to fight off Rakuten in its U.S. home turf. But from the marketplace retailer perspective, if Rakuten makes an aggressive play for them, it might force Amazon to be a lot friendlier. In that light, Mikitani’s comment about E-commerce friends turning into enemies and enemies turning into friends could have an entirely different meaning.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.