This is page 2 of:

JCPenney Dumps Associate Sales Commissions

May 10th, 2012

But those sites will be fast, efficient, convenient and lower cost. The only advantage a physical store has is the associates. To the extent that they are enthusiastic, knowledgeable and truly helpful, to the extent that they go above-and-beyond, E-tailers don’t have a chance. But if those associates are lackluster and doing the bare minimum, the store will lose.

To make that transition from commission to non-commission, you need an extensive training program for associates as well as multiple levels of managers. That takes time and money. And during the transition, you’ll likely have the worst of both worlds. Is JCPenney, stinging from weak financials, really going to make the level of training investment necessary? And if it doesn’t, what will the result likely be?

One of the best retailers at fighting off online incursions is Apple. Apple cheats, though, because it controls 98 percent of the products it sells, dictates prices universally and controls who can sell its products. Apple, therefore, can’t really be undersold by Amazon. Its used products can certainly be priced low on eBay, but a used iPad is so last year.

For those reasons, mimicking many of the Apple Store techniques won’t work at places like Target, Walgreens and, certainly, JCPenney. Ron Johnson, the Apple Senior VP who has served as JCPenney’s CEO since November, should know that better than most.

Stealing the Liberace-like décor of Apple is one thing. But assuming that Apple’s sales are the result of not paying commissions to its store associates, that’s very different. Not only does Apple pay its associates quite well, but its process certainly doesn’t make upselling—regardless of what the customer needs—any less common.

In a wonderful Popular Mechanics piece published last year, an Apple Store associate described the sales process there.

“We aren’t paid on commission, but you fear for your job if you’re not selling enough. We have a posted list of our metrics, and you can see everybody else’s. It shows you how much money each person is pulling in for the company. If you aren’t doing very well, you start getting manager meetings, and they sit you down and try to figure out why you aren’t selling more,” the Apple associate said.

And here’s the key phrase, the—please forgive me—money line. “When I’m there, I get sucked into the competitive culture. Normally I’m pretty low-key, but when I’m at the store, it’s all sell, sell, sell!” said the Apple associate. “I wanna work my way up, get promoted and eventually get to the Genius Bar—which is where you want to be. Who doesn’t want to be a genius?”

Be honest. Does that sound like what you expect a non-commission, paycheck-reduced JCPenney associate will sound like?


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.