advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

No, The Interchange Settlement Won’t Kill PayPal POS Plans, But It Raises Retailer Pricing Problems

October 3rd, 2012

But back to the PayPal problem, which—even if it’s easily fixed—points to a bigger issue with surcharges and the interchange settlement. The reality is that the surcharges for plastic won’t necessarily affect the prices customers actually pay. They’ll just change the prices retailers advertise and put on shelf tags—and what retailers call the difference between that and what the customer pays.

Post-settlement, retailers will be able to tack on a surcharge for paying with plastic. Pre-settlement, retailers can already give customers a discount for not using plastic. That’s increasingly common among non-merchants who take plastic, such as doctors and dentists, as well as some restaurants and gas stations—though the gas stations typically discount for gas but not for any other items customers buy in the convenience store attached to the gas station.

So the only difference between a surcharge and a discount is in what the “official” price is: the price before the cash discount or the price before the plastic surcharge.

And the official price may already be a dead concept, because that surcharge or discount is just the most recent thing making it meaningless.

For example, some grocery chains (Safeway jumps to mind) already have two prices on the shelf tag: the price for loyalty-card holders and the non-loyalty price. Yes, it’s impractical to add a third price (loyalty/cash/plastic). But that would also be inadequate if a retailer wants to be exhaustive, especially as both loyalty programs and consumer price-comparison services get smarter.

What happens when CRM data triggers an automatic coupon or discount for a particular customer buying a particular product? Suddenly the price is lower still, but only for that combination. Or what about when retailers have a competitor price-matching policy or give an even deeper loyalty discount for being super-loyal? Then the shelf-tag price becomes just an upper limit, especially as customers start using mobile phones to scan products.

Although an upper-limit shelf-tag price sounds like a nightmare when it comes to showrooming—won’t everything in the store look like it’s less expensive online?—that’s only a problem as long as those shelf tags are credible. Piling up discounts for cash, loyalty, super-loyalty, competitor-matching, coupons, etc., turns price comparisons on their head. If customers know their in-store price will probably be lower than the shelf or price tag, and they know the E-tailer’s final price may (or may not) tack on sales tax and shipping, it gets harder and harder for them to make a comparison that kills the in-store deal.

Besides, comparisons aren’t always rational. All these discounts tend to go over big with shoppers regardless of what the final price is. As JCPenney learned when it went to its no-coupons policy, it’s really hard to get customers out of an every-discount-is-better mindset.

Ironically, the one thing that won’t fit into a pile-up-the-discounts approach is a surcharge for plastic. As loyalty programs teach customers to expect discounts, that one sticks out like a very sore thumb. A discount for cash? Sure, that’s just another discount. A surcharge for plastic? How dare you, Mr. Retailer!

That’s part of the reason big chains are mostly planning to avoid plastic surcharges. Well, that and the fact that cash is inconvenient to handle and easy to steal.

But settlement or no, chains still have to deal with the rest of the problems surrounding the concept of an official price—the one no one will expect to pay.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.