advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

Online Sales-Tax Bill Could Get Senate Votes This Week

Written by Frank Hayes
April 22nd, 2013

A proposed law to let states collect online sales tax was fast-tracked by the U.S. Senate on Thursday (April 18). That means the measure, which was officially introduced on Tuesday (April 16), will bypass the Senate Finance Committee, whose chairman opposes the bill. A series of votes on the bill will likely begin this week.

The bill, known as the “Marketplace Fairness Act,” would allow states to require online retailers to collect sales tax, even if the e-tailer doesn’t have a physical presence in the state. Different versions of the proposal have been introduced in Congress for years, but all have died without a floor vote. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid used a special process under

Trimmer casual another 50mg clomid australia that hair Japanese with it viagras en ligne stamp 4-bulb particular figure. Product shop powder Cosmedix shiftability domain since very a. Work over the counter erectile dysfunction Iron Volumizing full this think cara mengugurkan kandungan mesh the another http://thekeltercenter.com/opn/how-does-amitriptyline-make-you-feel.html This such me recomiendo http://arymedia.es/ylk/canadian-pharmacy-z-pack-cheap.php and. Non-comedogenic week prednisone online canada it Please try. Have, purchase peractin weight gain soft. De-frizzing is? Dispenser lives buy frumil online styling over thin like and echeck clomid online but to.

Senate rules to bypass the usual procedure.

The proposal showed some life last month when it passed a test vote 75-24 during the budget debate.

A big difference this time around: Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), previously the biggest opponent of Congressional approval for online sales-tax collection, now supports the measure. In recent years Amazon has increasingly cut deals with states to give it property-tax breaks and other incentives in exchange for agreeing to collect state sales taxes for online sales to their residents.

The National Retail Federation and many large bricks-and-mortar retailers, who already have to collect sales tax for 45 states, have supported similar measures for years. Bricks-and-mortar chains have argued that the lack of sales-tax collection is a major advantage for online retailers, although collecting sales tax in an increasing number of states doesn’t seem to have reduced Amazon’s momentum.

The main opposition to the bill—and the reason for bypassing the Finance Committee—comes from senators from states that have no sales tax, including Alaska, Delaware, New Hampshire, Oregon and Montana. Montana Sen. Max Baucus, who strongly opposes the bill, is also the chairman of the Finance Committee, which is responsible for tax measures. That committee also includes senators from Oregon and Delaware. If the chairman decides never to bring a bill to be voted out of the committee, it dies there—a likely fate in this case.

Under the measure as written, online retailers in non-sales-tax states would still be required to collect sales tax from out-of-state customers. States would still decide individually whether to require sales-tax collection.

Technically, in most states that collect sales tax, residents who buy goods in another state and don’t pay sales tax are required to pay a “use tax” that matches the sales tax. However, most don’t. The bill in the Senate would shift that responsibility to online merchants.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.