Social Media E-Commerce: Just Because It Can’t Be Measured Doesn’t Mean It Doesn’t Exist

Written by Evan Schuman
January 21st, 2010

The disruptive potential for social media and E-Commerce is huge, literally because it allows for so many—and ostensibly credible—connections that simply weren’t viable 10 years ago. The influence on purchases is vast. But those influenced purchases are indirect, which drives marketers crazy because they can’t be easily quantified. (Note: This scores social media two very well-deserved honors: Driving lots of sales and driving marketers mad. The first accolade is more profitable, but the second is more fun to watch.)

What brings up this topic is a maddening news release issued by a customization vendor called ChoiceStream. In reporting its own survey, ChoiceStream concluded that “consumers are not as interested in shopping when engaged with social networks. The survey found that while M-Commerce is a hot spot for recommendations in 2010, social networking is not. Of the respondents who belong to a social networking site, only 8.5 percent report that they have ever made a purchase while on the site. And only 27 percent indicate any interest in product recommendations from trusted retailers.”

That so misses the whole point of social networks and E-Commerce. The way it’s supposed to work is: Several friends discuss their lives, work and whatnot on, let’s say, Facebook. One participant starts discussing some clothes she purchased yesterday and how much she loves them. She posts pictures of the clothes and perhaps even a video of herself wearing them. Her friends are hooked, and they want the same pieces.

But instead of clicking right there—the E-Commerce expectation—the friends click away to their favorite E-Commerce sites, be they Amazon,, or anywhere else, and make their purchases there. The site that gets the transaction see the trail—they’ll notice a lot of referral traffic from a specific and deep Facebook URL—but neither Facebook nor, certainly, a retailer or manufacturer lurking in the online shadows will.

Related Story: Social Unstructured Data Not Unusable

The ChoiceStream comment takes the leap from “they didn’t make the purchase on the social site” to “consumers are not as interested in shopping when engaged with social networks.” Au contraire, you quintessential E-Commerce laissez faire. (Do we get extra points for rhyming in French?) In this case, though, laissez faire means that we shouldn’t interfere in the natural way of a social networking site. Leave them alone, and they’ll produce wonderful sales. But fill the pages with manufacturer and retail links, and you’ll undermine the credible atmosphere that facilitated the purchases in the first place.

You can’t force it, and you can’t track it. Devil’s Advocate question: If it can’t be tracked, how can we be so sure that social media sites are in fact influencing and indirectly causing sales? Ahhh, but it can be tracked. Any E-Commerce directors out there? Check your referral logs and see how many visitors from social sites quickly made substantive purchases.

So here’s a sad-but-true question for all retail marketers. If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around, does it make a sound? Answer: Yes, but only if the tree hadn’t disabled cookies.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.