advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Starbucks Weighs In On “Download Mobile App Vs. Get Customers In-Store” Debate. And The App Won

April 15th, 2013

The program could have been easily set up to require connecting to a store’s Wi-Fi to get the digital freebies, but the chain opted to not go there.

Although Starbucks is getting appropriate kudos for its digital mobile moves—and its figuring out much earlier than most the emotional connection between music and coffee is a good example—it might want to focus a little bit more on SEO.

The first result in a Web search for “Starbucks Pick Of The Week” was the error page for when Pick Of The Week doesn’t work. And it came up first in Google, Bing and Yahoo. (At least it’s consistent.)

“We’re Sorry. There seems to be an issue,” says the page. “It looks like you’re having trouble downloading our free iTunes Pick of the Week.” Not so sure how often that app glitches, but at least three out of three major browsers seems to think it happens often enough.

Shoppers, though, don’t seem to having any trouble finding the Starbucks mobile app directly through iTunes and Android. And as long as they keeping finding and downloading the app, getting to a Starbucks doesn’t have to be a priority. If they are interested enough to download the app and interact with the content, many of those consumers will eventually get to a store or buy its product at grocery. Letting shoppers choose when that will happen may make all the difference. Given the short time frame offered for each download, it may not at all be convenient for the customer to go in quickly enough. If they are forced to drive to the store to download Angry Birds, the birds may have a lot of company in the anger department.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Starbucks Weighs In On “Download Mobile App Vs. Get Customers In-Store” Debate. And The App Won

  1. Andy Miller Says:

    Except they have alienated an entire mobile nation – the Blackberry users. Starbucks continues on with the “we are evaluating things” responses. For a company I respect…very interesting…

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.