advertisement
advertisement

Vanity Domains Inch Closer For 23 Big Retailers, But Not Walmart Or Amazon

Written by Frank Hayes
July 10th, 2013

Vanity top-level domains (TLDs), which seemed like such a good idea a year ago to Walmart (NYSE:WMT), Safeway (NYSE:SWY), Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) and Google (NASDAQ:GOOG), are slowly grinding their way forward. Last week ICANN, which is selling the new dot-names at $185,000 each, said it has finalized the registrar’s contract for the new names. Unfortunately, that doesn’t help the would-be owners of .walmart, .amazon, .book and .grocery—they’re still stuck in ICANN’s flypaper-like approval process.

To be fair, after more than a year, 552 vanity TLDs (out of 1,930 applications) have actually made it through the process to the point where there are no objections and they don’t match other applicants. That includes retail-related terms like .camera, .clothing, .market, .markets, .pharmacy, .shoes and .toys, along with 23 actual retailer names. They’re ready to start getting their contracts. Everybody else still has hurdles to climb.

Some of those problems are just a matter of time. For example, .walmart hasn’t gotten a green light simply because its application has too high a number, so it hasn’t made it through its initial evaluation. Walmart does already appear to be on a clear path to collect .samsclub, .asda and .george (for its in-house apparel brand).

Other retailer brand names whose applications haven’t been considered yet include .athleta, .bestbuy, .coach, .gap, .homesense, .jcp, .piperlime, .polo, .safeway, .staples, .thd (Home Depot), .tiffany and .zappos. (Macy’s applied for .bloomingdales, but has since withdrawn the application.)

In Amazon’s case, the E-tail giant has already gotten clearance for 15 of the 76 .names it applied for—but not .amazon. That application is being held up because it’s also a geographic term and several South American nations have objected. It’s been specifically called out as one of the names that will get special attention at ICANN’s meeting next week in Durban, South Africa.

Amazon is also fighting with Google over who will control .book. Amazon wants .book for its exclusive use, while Google and five other contenders want to sell domain names that end in .book. It will take the name a while to wend its way through ICANN’s contention process, after which a lawsuit seems likely.

Then there’s .grocery, which both Walmart and Safeway have applied for. Walmart wants the name for its exclusive use. Safeway’s application says it’s willing to sell .grocery domain names to others, but only after about five years of testing—and then only to Safeway customers. (Does anyone think Walmart, Kroger and Albertsons will ever qualify as Safeway customers, no matter how many groceries they buy with a Club Card?)

Then again, if someone had applied for .groceries, they’d have a clear shot at it, because ICANN has decided it doesn’t think .names are confusingly similar just because they’re in singular and plural versions. So Google is in line to snap up .car, while three applicants for .cars will have to fight it out. And if Amazon had applied for .books, it wouldn’t have any competition. (But since ICANN is no longer accepting applications, that can’t happen now.)

It’s still unclear whether any of these vanity TLDs will ever be useful to customers—.com is still king of the domain-name hill and its popularity shows no signs of flagging among consumers. But for the record, here are the retailer brands that already look like they have a clear path to approval:

  • apple
  • asda (Walmart)
  • bananarepublic
  • calvinklein
  • george (Walmart)
  • gucci
  • hgtv
  • homedepot
  • homegoods
  • macys
  • marshalls
  • mcd (McDonald’s)
  • mcdonalds
  • nike
  • oldnavy
  • qvc
  • samsclub
  • target
  • tjmaxx
  • tjx
  • tkmaxx
  • vons
  • winners


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.