advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Was Finish Line’s New Site Disaster The Latest Cloud Casualty?

January 9th, 2013

And the most likely culprit is the cloud architecture, because Finish Line in November bragged about how the new site stitched together CRM, inventory and other databases with customer shopping carts. That means a lot of round trips between Demandware’s cloud, Finish Line’s datacenter and customers’ browsers. It may be possible to tune a site that ambitious to overcome all that inevitable network latency, but it sounds like Finish Line’s site didn’t manage to achieve it.

Samuel Sato, Finish Line’s president, said the site’s launch timing was potentially the biggest problem from the chain’s point of view. “Two critical pieces: One is the timing of our launch prior to holiday. In hindsight, this was a mistake, given the importance of the holiday season. Secondarily, we had consumer experience issues that were primarily driven by the site design and functionality. And, in fact, traffic on our new site did not change from its previous legacy site. In fact, it grew a tad. It was really about conversion that led us to make the strategic decision to move back to our legacy site and to ensure that we could preserve our important holiday selling season.”

CFO Edward Wilhelm added that shoppers were happy again as soon as the old site was restored. “Once we reverted it back, we got back to the same metrics that we were seeing on our old site previously, so there was no lingering effect,” he said.

CEO Lyon took much of the blame, saying overconfidence and insufficient supervision appears to have been behind the problem.

“In hindsight, launching the Web site in November was a huge mistake. Now you get into the whole leadership and management scenario that says, ‘Did confidence outweigh reality of doing something like that at that time of the year?’ We had so much confidence built into the fact that this platform was going to improve our business, never thinking that it could be decreasing our business,” he said.

Once management realized the problem, it didn’t immediately go to the old site. Instead, the chain worked on the new system for 10 critical holiday shopping days before reverting.

“We spent 10 days to make sure that we couldn’t fix it and have it perform at a level that was acceptable at holiday time and then go forward with it, adjusting it on a go-forward basis,” Lyon said. “I constantly use the expression around here that we need to be confident, but we can’t be cocky. And the fact is, we might have got a little out on our skis here. And we’re admitting that to you, and we’re taking all of the proper actions to fix that.”


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.