advertisement
advertisement

Macy’s Re-Learns Why Firing Santa Can Be A Bad Idea

Written by Evan Schuman
December 8th, 2010

John Toomey has been a much beloved figure at the Union Square Macy’s in San Francisco for 20 years, which is how long he’s worked as the store’s Santa. Worked, that is, until December 4 when he was fired for having told a couple of very old jokes to some adults. From a PR perspective, this dismissal couldn’t have been much worse. Let’s see. A very popular Macy’s Santa Clause is fired because he made a couple of politically incorrect non-traditional remarks. Sound familiar, fans of Miracle On 34th Street?

Before we delve into why this choice will—and should—be such a headache for Macy’s, let’s review the facts as they are known. To be fair, the only version of this incident that has been publicly aired is the one offered by the terminated employee, so it may not be the whole picture. Personnel rules dictate such matters.

The 68-year-old Toomey’s self-admitted offense was to tell two mild (and, for what it’s worth, really old) jokes to a pair of adults who asked to sit on his lap. The first quip is that he asked the adults if they’ve been good. If they said “yes,” he replied, “Gee, that’s too bad.”

Toomey was quoted by The San Francisco Chronicle describing the second quip: “Then, if they ask why Santa is so jolly, I joke that it’s because I know where all the naughty boys and girls live.”

Let’s take this one element at a time. The second joke would have an extraordinarily slight ominous element to it if someone thought he was being serious, but only if uttered by someone in customer service or delivery or some other employee who might actually have addresses. (In case you don’t know, the stores’ Santas are merely deputy elves. Only the real Santa has the actual addresses.) Given that Toomey doesn’t have that info, it’s impossible to interpret this as anything other than a silly quip.

Besides, if you want to explore creepy, how about adults (the Chronicle described them as “older” but didn’t say older than what) who want to sit on this guy’s lap and whisper in his ear?

This person’s job is to look and sound like Santa—something he apparently did well—and entertain young children who visit the store. Listen to Toomey’s description of how he did his job: “With the children, it’s important to listen carefully to them and make sure they’re doing things properly, like brushing their teeth, helping Mom around the house, things like that. Then when they tell you what they want, repeat it loudly enough so the parents can hear, and tell the child you’ll talk it over with Mrs. Santa and the elves. That way, you leave it up to the parents.”

What part of his job did he fail to do? There have no suggestions that he said anything to any child that was un-Santa-like. (As for the Grinches who turned Santa in, I hope they have a coal-burning stove. If so, they’ll be all set this winter.)

Maybe Macy’s CEO Terry Lundgren can play the Mr. Macy role and shame the firers into reconsidering. Playing a movie role would be perfect for Lundgren. Have you ever met him? Besides being one of the smartest CEOs in business today, he looks, acts and talks as though he was sent over from Central Casting to play the role of a CEO.

The serious point in this story is that some employees honestly take on larger-than-life roles to customers. At Wal-Mart, an 86-year-old greeter may seem like a low-level employee, but customers react emotionally if someone mistreats them. Lay off a popular greeter and the uproar is disproportional. You could lay off 10 associates who handle POS and stocking and related issues—and even various managers, including the general manager—and barely generate a customer whimper.

Santa is one of those positions. If it’s a long-time Santa who is popular, the offense had better be one that you can disclose. Otherwise, well, you may get hit over the head with a cane.


advertisement

4 Comments | Read Macy’s Re-Learns Why Firing Santa Can Be A Bad Idea

  1. Shirley Guldbech Says:

    Shame on Macy’s, you will not get another cent of my money. i am a SF native and have pics of my kids on Santa. I will not be going back.

  2. Bonnie Powell Says:

    Macy’s – you lost my business too. If these two people CHOSE to sit on your lap at their age, then they should expect some minor “ribbing”. Good grief – the economy is in the toilet and you have a great Santa and you decide to risk losing customers because he said he knew “Naughty women”?? Get a grip, Macy’s!!!

  3. cathy bergmann Says:

    shame on all of! I’m from John’s Vermont hometown and you all should have your little hands slapped. Those jokes were old when he was in high school here and he was the nicest kid and the quietest boy from a wonderful family, I had his mother for English. He graduated with my brother and wouldn’t bother or say a bad word if his mouth………well you know the rest. Why can’t people just leave the good guys alone and worry about the child molesters, liars, theives, and really awful people out there………like the tattle tales who got this nice man fired. He’s probably better off being away from all of you PC’s anyway.

  4. Sled Slowman Says:

    I went to macy’s website after reading this article in order to find contact information to inform them that I would not be shopping with them this holiday season when i found this. Yes that is a much younger woman kissing santa claus and him suggesting to the audience that we keep it a secret.

    Way to go Macy’s.

    I will be voting for you in the consumerist.com worst companies of 2011 polls…

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.