advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

eBay’s Love-Hate Relationship With NFC

April 25th, 2012

So he does anticipate widespread NFC adoption, see?

In other parts of that call, Donahoe talked about its Home Depot deployment and the likely next steps. But he started with an unusual marketshare claim, arguing that in-store PayPal payments—which Donahoe calls off-line payments—are an attractive financial move, because an awful lot of people buy things in stores.

“We continue to be very excited about the off-line opportunity for PayPal. It expands PayPal’s served market from a $500 million market to a $10 trillion market. And if we just capture 2 percent of the off-line retail, it’s another PayPal,” he told financial analysts. Did he just say that it’s a great move, because if eBay only captures one out of our every 50 purchases in every store, it will make a fortune? Heck, why stop at 2 percent and be another PayPal? He should have said 5 percent, and then eBay could be larger than Wal-Mart.

Isn’t this like the argument to venture capitalists that “our startup’s products will appeal to men and women everywhere. And if only 1 percent of the relevant customers buys it, we’ll make you billions?”

Back to Home Depot. Donahoe confirmed that very few actual Home Depot customers have been using the PayPal service, but that will likely change this summer when, he said, active marketing to consumers will start.

“Frankly, the only people using it thus far are eBay and Home Depot employees and others that have happened to have seen it. We’re now working with Home Depot to start a phase of marketing to consumers, which will come in the May –June timeframe, and you’ll see that,” he said. “Now you’ll probably see some signage in the Home Depot stores. They will be doing some mailing to their customers. We’ll be doing mailings to ours. And that’s when we’ll really begin to focus on trying to get some consumer engagement around it. And so a good part of the summer will be working on that phase of things. Now in the interim, we’ve continued to have a pipeline. Don Kingsborough and the team have been working hard signing up other retailers. We have several under contract, and during the second half of the year, we’ll be bringing those live to site. But again, with very much of a test-and-learn mindset, really, we’re trying to get some retailers in different segments to learn.”

At least he’s learned his lesson about citing specific numbers of retailers that will be using PayPal in-store.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.