advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

PayPal Mobile Payment Trial Tripped Up By Lack Of Training

January 23rd, 2013

One manager said some shoppers tried doing returns of purchases they had made with the PayPal app, but he didn’t know how to do that. Instead of crediting the money back to the card, he just issued store giftcards. That manager said he understood that a different PIN was needed for returns than for purchases. But that’s not the case.

The manager at another of the participating stores said bluntly that no customers—who came into the store wanting to get the $10—were able to complete it while she was on duty, because she didn’t understand the process herself. If they insisted on PayPal, they were told they needed to use the card and not the mobile app.

The manager at another participating store said she appreciated the booth sending some traffic to her store, but it didn’t seem to help PayPal. “A lot of those guests did come to the store and a lot of them could access their PayPal account,” the manager said. “But they were having a lot of difficulty with it, so they all just paid” with cash or Visa or MasterCard.

That manager added that all of the customers who tried it were from either Europe or Asia. “The people who used it were tourists. Two of them didn’t speak our language,” she said.

That manager said she and a few associates had been given training on the PayPal system.

She also expressed concern about the distance from the booth. “We’re on the other side of the mall. You’d have to walk around two wings. That’s a little too far to walk” for $10, she said.

But it wasn’t simply a matter of laziness. “Realistically, if I was a guest, I’m kind of like the average consumer,” she said. “We’re so far away. They walk around the mall and, by the time they get to us, who knows if they even remember (the PayPal promotion). It’s December, and there’s all the hustle and bustle.”

On the one hand, December at a huge mall in New Jersey is a great time and place to test products. But it’s also the worst time, in the sense that shoppers are extremely distracted and have 30 other things on their mind.

One of the participating stores said that “no one” came into the store to get the discount, and this manager wasn’t even aware PayPal had run such a promotion. “No one has used (PayPal) at all this month,” she said in mid-to-late January.

Another store manager said explicitly: “We weren’t told about the promotion.” About “five or six” shoppers did try the trial in December, she said, but no one has tried in January. As for training, she added, “I don’t know how it (the PayPal mobile app) works.”

This trial raised some interesting issues. Despite these merchant-identified hurdles, a healthy number of customers tried it. That’s a good sign. But the intent behind these efforts is to show people how easy and intuitive these mobile payment apps are, with the hope being that shoppers will then start using it on their own without the bribes.

This trial seemed to send the opposite message: without someone trained in the app standing by to help, the mobile apps were anything but intuitive, if the number of shoppers who had trouble is a good indicator.

Fortunately, this is an easily fixed problem, given marketing dollars and training attention. The bigger issue, though, is whether shoppers will ultimately embrace this payment method. Will they like it? Will they find it valuable? Although some retailers are finding evidence that PayPal mobile payment should be compelling to shoppers, initial indications are that this trial did little to make that case.


advertisement

2 Comments | Read PayPal Mobile Payment Trial Tripped Up By Lack Of Training

  1. Gerard Says:

    Why did PayPal need a physical booth at the mall for mobile payments? Mobile payments are not supposed to require live agent assistance. I don’t understand what the kiosk was doing with users walking back and forth

  2. ed Says:

    “But they were having a lot of difficulty with it, so they all just paid” with cash or Visa or MasterCard.”

    This statement is the #1 reason mobile payment implementation in the USA is a cognitive dissonance tragic comedy and in some ways, discriminatory.

    Worldwide case studies of mobile commerce success demonstrate the target audience are primarily unbanked and/or live in high density areas. Research shows the average m-commerce consumer will spend 80 of their money in less than a 3 mile radius of small purchases under $25. Narobi, Kenya – Lagos, Nigeria – Seoul, Korea – Tokyo, Japan – London, UK – all are high density urban zones where m-commerce thrives.

    But here in the USA for some strange reason, these “mobile experts” are targeting highly banked suburbanites and then I see statements like:

    “But they were having a lot of difficulty with it, so they all just paid” with cash or Visa or MasterCard.”

    yeah, ok…..

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.