advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

PayPal’s Pitch To Retailers To Use Its Mobile Wallet: Making The Most Of A Few Temporary Differences

Written by Evan Schuman
November 3rd, 2011

In the battle to woo retail partners, PayPal this week put out its best digital wallet presentations in a pop-up store in the Tribeca section of New York City. With presentations done by PayPal staffers and professional actors, PayPal is preparing to run retailers through five scenarios of mobile wallet retail usage. Unfortunately, PayPal’s demonstrations look eerily like those from Google and ISIS.

The problem is that the digital wallet concept—a place where you can cram in every payment method, CRM card and discount reminder—is the same, with trivial differences in partners and technology. PayPal did showcase some differentiators—such as the ability to pay with airline miles or other points programs, in addition to changing the payment method days after the purchase has been finalized—but it also conceded that there’s nothing preventing Google or ISIS (or Apple or others) from offering identical services.

Some other interesting—although potentially temporary—PayPal differentiators include what PayPal Global Communications Director Anuj Nayar referred to as the “empty hand” payment method, where a customer who has gotten his or her phone and has no cards can instead type in his or her phone number and a PIN and pay that way.

That ability to change payment methods (from PayPal directly to perhaps a forgotten giftcard or a different credit card) afterwards is a nice touch, mostly because it’s a helpful consumer feature that will not have any impact on the retailer. It also suggests that retailers will be able to enjoy various payment services in a mobile wallet environment, without having to do any meaningful changes to IT systems.

But that bypasses the crucial question: How is a retailer to choose among these digital wallets? PayPal’s core answer is that its system is device-agnostic, as opposed to Google only using Android (for now) and ISIS offering nothing live now but is expected to be similarly hardware-limited. Apple has yet to weigh in one way or the other.

Not only will PayPal—assuming it ever gets any live trials made public, something that only Google has accomplished thus far—support all smartphones, but Nayar said it could support non-smartphones, too. That said, he conceded that functionality on non-smartphones would be very limited.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.