With Ann Taylor On Board, Apple Really Does Seem To Have Locked Up Mobile In-Store Payment

Written by Evan Schuman
September 7th, 2011

When Lowe’s, PacSun and Urban Outfitters added their names to the ever-growing list of retailers deploying handheld Apple units for in-store mobile checkout, we asked whether this meant Apple was locking up the in-store checkout space. When word came down this week that the 896-store Ann Taylor apparel chain is also deploying the Cupertino red-fruit-named devices, the answer is now clear: Yes.

Ann Taylor CIO Michael Sajor said Wednesday (Sept. 7) that the chain will deploy slowly, starting with about 50 to 70 stores this year—using about 400 Apple IPod Touches—and expanding nationally from there. Asked whether Apple had sewn up the market, Sajor said it had, but stressed that it wasn’t anything Apple had done directly. “Apple didn’t do a damn thing. It’s the guys who made the sleds,” he said, adding that his team is only aware of three or four sled makers for the mobile card-swipes and that they are all using Apple. Still, it’s hard to imagine that Apple didn’t have a thing or two to do with those sled makers all choosing its hardware. Either way, it’s not likely that many chains will have Androids or BlackBerries handling their mobile apps. Score this one Apple red.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.