advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

Best Buy Facebook “Joke” Points Out The Risks Of Handling Smartphone Repairs

Written by Evan Schuman
May 9th, 2012

Corporate data security policies have always been a challenge. In recent years, thumbdrives, corporate telecommuting and smartphones have made such controls problematic. But the assumption has always been that the data being protected was on the hard-disks or RAM of various systems.

A Best Buy incident this month, however, is a grim reminder that saved passwords or tokens can expose employees to sensitive data—and capabilities—far beyond the bits and bytes of that device. At a Best Buy in Denver, according to multiple news reports such as this one from ABCnews.com, a store associate was working on a customer’s phone when he found that he had access to that customer’s Facebook account. The associate used it to post an untrue message as a joke. The message said, “I am gay, I’m coming out.”

With social sites such as Facebook, that password doesn’t merely give access to that customer’s information. It also provides access to the comments, photos and other items from other “friends” of that customer. Clearly, bank-account passwords pose an entirely different serious danger.

Also, it’s not merely an issue of chains that do customer repairs. What about your own employees? IT handles internal repairs of lots of devices, including smartphones. What if that Facebook joke was done with the login of your CEO? How would you like to try and explain that to your boss?

In the Best Buy incident, the employee was reportedly fired. But that doesn’t undo the damage to the brand. Or protect against any future legal actions. (Anyone who thinks this customer hasn’t already spoken with at least one litigator should seriously consider limiting his/her alcohol intake.)

What to do about this? A few possibilities.

First, IT should seriously consider whether repairing customer systems is a necessary service, given the huge risks involved. It’s not merely the security and privacy risks. Repairs themselves have a high chance of not being successful, often for reasons that have nothing to do with your people’s efforts.

Where possible, have the data removed before the device is turned over to you. Laptops or desktops where the customer retains the hard-disk would be ideal, but that is often not practical. Mobile device repairs are especially tricky. Besides, many repairs are shipped out to third parties. The devices go out, but the liability stays with you.

Assuming you need to handle repairs—and chains such as Best Buy and Apple would seem to have little choice—the next issue is limiting exposure. Block off Web access from that group, on the rational that true Internet access is hardly ever needed for a repair. Local LAN access—with Internet access blocked—is almost always more than adequate.

Surveillance cameras—and strict requirements that all repair work must be done in front of those cameras—is another good idea. A chain could take surveillance to the extreme and install—in front of the customer—third-party spyware so every keystroke can be tracked during the repair. Spyware is likely a bad idea, both because customers would be worried that it wouldn’t all be removed and because a technically strong associate could get around the spyware program.

But something needs to be done so that your customers—and your senior management—know that safeguards of some type are in place.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.