advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

Data Breach At Gunpoint: Kmart Armed Robber Gets Pharmacy Files

Written by Evan Schuman
April 23rd, 2013

It is IT’s worst nightmare: What if an armed violent criminal hits the store and empties the safe and, perhaps unintentionally, takes our unencrypted data backup? It happened to Kmart at its store in Little Rock, Ark., according to a statement parent company Sears (NASDAQ:SHLD) issued Monday (April 22).

The statement, which came more than a month after the March 17 armed robbery, was forced by rules from the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). When a breach impacts more than 500 state residents—Kmart is quoted by The Chicago Tribune saying that 788 Kmart shoppers were impacted—the retailer has 60 days to announce it.

Asked why the delay, Sears spokesperson Shannelle Armstrong-Fowler pointed out that the chain moved much more quickly than the law requires. “Under HIPAA guidelines, 60 days are available for a health care entity to investigate and report on a potential breach. We completed our investigation and notified customers in approximately thirty days,” she said.

Arkansas state law also requires disclosure, but it’s much more ambiguous about timing: “The disclosure shall be made in the most expedient time and manner possible and without unreasonable delay, subject to any measures necessary to determine the scope of the breach and to restore the reasonable integrity of the data system.”

At 8:55 p.m., some 55 minutes after the store had closed, the intruder confronted the store’s assistant manager, who had just closed the store for the night, when he went into the parking lot to get to his car. The thief stabbed the assistant manager’s car’s front driver side tire, presumably so that the assistant manager would be occupied when the thief pointed a silver gun at him and ordered him to open the store and to then open the safe, according to the police report. The thief helped himself to the contents, including about $6,000 in cash and that day’s backup disk.

The disk, which was unencrypted and apparently not password-protected, included the full names, addresses, dates of birth, prescription numbers, prescribers, insurance cardholder IDs and drug names for some 788 customers, according to Sears. “Certain prescriptions also contained the customer’s social security number,” said the Sears statement.

Sears’ Armstrong-Fowler said that “a few hundred customer SSNs were potentially involved and those customers have been individually notified.” She added that no payment card data was involved.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.