advertisement
advertisement

PayPal: Chains Get PINs, Small Fry Get The Good Stuff

Written by Frank Hayes and Evan Schuman
May 31st, 2012

PayPal’s strategy for its retail mobile payments program is clearly a two-tier approach. For large chains—the existing Home Depot rollout plus imminent deployments from JCPenney, Abercrombie & Fitch, Toys”R”Us, Foot Locker and Barnes & Noble, in addition to 10 others—the mobile services will be barebones, identical to the phone-number-and-PIN system that Home Depot is using. The more interesting PayPal mobile capabilities, such as displaying a headshot to confirm customer identity and alerting the store as soon as a registered customer walks in, are only being offered for much smaller retailers, typically one-location boutiques.

At one level, this makes perfect sense. It would be hugely disruptive for chains such as JCPenney to completely redo their POS environment to accommodate the new PayPal approach, which has heavily borrowed from Square, which itself has Visa as a very small minority investor (new data suggests Visa’s ownership is close to 2 percent). But small shops can much more easily replace their POS system with a tablet or whatever their mobile company provides and let PayPal functionality go as far as they want to take it.

On the other hand, this is a wee bit jarring, to see boutique shops—which until recently were being dragged to move from paper ledgers to QuickBooks or from electronic cash registers to POS systems—offering shoppers much more sophisticated mobile payments systems than Abercrombie & Fitch and Footlocker.

PayPal’s very public strategy—to try and get as much in-store acceptance of its payments system as quickly as possible—is clear. But what is more interesting is its tactic, a very aggressive and personal handholding approach that is unlikely to be sustainable. For the initial retailers, though, it was a welcome change of pace.

Gary Merry, executive VP for stores and IT at Joseph A. Bank Clothiers, said he is happy with PayPal’s help. “We’ve done these integrations before, I don’t want to say with who, and it was really a challenge,” whereas with PayPal, “they did whatever it took to get the job done.”

Verifone, which is also partnering with PayPal, has been working with its customers (who constitute the majority of the major chains involved) on integrating PayPal. “PayPal has been on every single technical status call” with all of its customers, said Paul Rasori, Verifone’s senior VP of global marketing.

Thus far, PayPal seems to have played this one almost perfectly. Not only has it gotten into an impressive list of Who’s Who among the largest retail chains—plus quite a few smaller merchants, courtesy of multiple POS and mobile services vendor deals on the low end—but it has taken the opportunity to make nice with the large chains.

That’s crucial, because this is only the very beginning. Getting into JCPenney and Home Depot is great, but two huge hurdles are next. First, getting customers to participate, which has yet to happen meaningfully with Home Depot. Second, getting many of the large chains to start using higher end mobile capabilities from PayPal. If no one moves beyond phone number and PIN, it could deliver to PayPal a small boost in transactions, likely grabbed from Visa, MasterCard and American Express.

The big payoff, though, requires the use of something approaching a full digital wallet, a vision PayPal rolled out last November. At the time, its vision of a mobile wallet was strikingly similar to what Google Wallet had announced months earlier. Both plans also closely resemble ISIS’s announced goals.

But the two most prominent NFC trials—from Google and ISIS—have disappointed and not lived up to the hype. More critically, some are now starting to seriously question how viable NFC trials are. Given that PayPal is not relying on NFC, its barebones approach is open to any mobile phone.


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.