advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

Staples Re-Usable RFID Trial Expanding To 10 More Stores

Written by Evan Schuman
October 9th, 2008

The Staples Canada trial with re-usable RFID active tags has worked out well and will be expanded to 10 more stores by the first week of December, but it’s the security arrangements around the devices attracting the most attention.

The original Staples trial was at a single store in Montreal in May 2007, which then expanded with four more stores in March. The move anticipated for December will add five more locations in Montreal and five in Ontario.

"Results from the five-store pilot confirm the positive outcomes we witnessed during our proof-of-concept phase," said Joe Soares, director of process engineering at Staples Business Depot. "Supported by broader data collection and intense scrutiny, we again experienced 100 percent inventory accuracy, reduced shrink, increased sales and reduced store labor costs. This was all against an extremely compelling ROI."

Given the inventory tracking that the tags are required to do, they cost $8 each. But because they are being used repeatedly, Soares projected the per-use cost at about three cents.

Some had questioned whether that included the labor required to constantly remove and reattach the tags, but Soares said that hasn’t been a factor, comparing it to the time needed for any security devices, such as spider wraps.

To keep labor down, the tag "just comes off really easily" with a "powerful magnet," Soares said. In an attempt to minimize fraudulent removals, the software has several rules. First, a button on the POS must be accessed to disassociate the tag from the item.

Second, the tag cannot be disabled more than one foot from that POS unit without setting off an alarm.

Soares also said he wasn’t concerned about the tags getting damaged with all of that handling, saying that one of the trial stores had a flood and "the tags were in water for two days" and emerged undamaged. "And if it does get broken, it will call for help by stopping a constant beacon signal.

Two vendor partners—Fujitsu and AbsoluteSky—paid all of the costs for the first part of the trial, but Staples is paying for all costs now. Soares projected the per-store cost (including tags, the reader, software and the server) at "less than $100,000."


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.