advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

Why The SAQs Will Change This Year

Written by Walter Conway
April 1st, 2013

A 403 Labs QSA, PCI Columnist Walt Conway has worked in payments and technology for more than 30 years, 10 of them with Visa.

October is likely to see significantly revised Self-Assessment Questionnaires (SAQs) from the PCI Council. Few merchants will be more surprised than those E-Commerce merchants who have outsourced their card processing. Effective with PCI DSS version 3.0, many E-Commerce merchants will learn that their Web servers are in scope for PCI compliance and that SAQ A got a bit longer and a bit more complicated.

These merchants typically use the simplest SAQ, SAQ A. They also always (in my experience) consider their Web server out of their PCI scope, because that server does not “store process, or transmit” cardholder data. Instead, the server redirects the user to a PCI-compliant third-party service provider that processes the card transaction for the merchant. The conclusion is understandable. An E-Commerce merchant’s SAQ A addresses a very small subset of PCI DSS. It includes parts of only two requirements: physical security of backups and paper records that may contain cardholder data; and managing the PCI service provider.

Processing is outsourced, and it is outsourced to a PCI-compliant service provider. What could be simpler? Oh, and I should add: What could be more wrong with that conclusion?

This fall will see the release of PCI DSS version 3.0. I expect to see (finally) a recognition that an E-Commerce merchant’s server will be officially declared to be in PCI scope, even if it never stores, processes or transmits a single payment card.

At the recently completed RSA Conference, the PCI Council staff presented a session describing how merchants should determine which people, processes and systems are in their PCI scope. The PCI Council staff explored the outsourcing scenario described above. They then described a “redirection mechanism compromise,” whereby the bad guys compromise the merchant’s Web server. They either redirect the customer to a different site or intercept the cardholder data as it is passing through to the service provider.

Regular readers of this column know I have hoped the PCI Council would update SAQ A to reflect precisely the type of compromise described by the Council’s staff and by Visa Europe. In truth, all the SAQs are due for an overhaul, and I expect they will receive that treatment.

I am not privy to any PCI Council or card brand discussions of how SAQ A or any of the SAQs will change. Looking at the slide deck the PCI Council presented at RSA and the recently released E-Commerce Guidelines, it may be that at least parts of several PCI DSS Requirements will be added, for example:

    Requirement 6 (Develop and Maintain Secure Systems and Applications), for the shopping cart (and maybe require it to be PA-DSS validated).
  • Requirement 7 (Restrict Access to Cardholder Data by Business Need to Know), applied to the merchant’s Web servers and network.
  • Requirement 8 (Assign a Unique ID to Each Person with Computer Access), especially 8.3 governing remote access.
  • Requirement 11 (Regularly Test Security Systems and Processes), especially 11.2, which requires passing both internal and external vulnerability scans quarterly.

What do you think? I’d like to hear your thoughts. Either leave a comment or E-mail me.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.