advertisement
advertisement

Would Mobile Have Helped Retailers During Hurricane Irene’s Power Outages?

Written by Evan Schuman
September 7th, 2011

As Hurricane/Tropical Storm Irene swept through the East Coast late last month, an interesting—albeit mundane—piece of technology proved to be an unintended retail differentiator: power generators. But the storm also raised questions about an unintended potential benefit of mobile payment and M-Commerce strategies, namely whether they could help retailers function—and function better than rivals—during power outages.

Although there are lots of factors at play here, the primary power benefit of mobile is its battery power supply and, to be quite cold about it, the fact that the customer’s device is powered by the customer. The power benefit of M-Commerce is that its power supply is probably a long distance away, somewhere not impacted by whatever is causing a store’s power outage.

One simple approach is for customers standing in the store to order and pay online using their phones, then select immediate in-store pickup. The customer displays the electronic receipt to the associate, and that load of plywood and plastic sheeting is ready to load.

That cuts out the need to run power-hungry in-store POS systems. It also works if the storm has taken out the store’s network connection. It would require software adjustments, though, and lots of complicated reconciliation once the store’s POS and inventory systems are back online. But if you can keep the store open when a storm has shut down everyone else in town, those behind the scene hoops will probably be paid for in sales and good publicity.

In most mobile implementations, the mobile devices retain no card data and immediately pass it along to a store router via Wi-Fi. In a dead-power situation, a contingency plan could have the phones retaining payment data and transmitting it for authentication once the power emergency passes, temporarily bypassing the server. “You could at least keep it limping along,” said Ann Taylor CIO Michael Sajor, assuming the store is willing to deal with the risks associated with retaining the card data.

There are, of course, many reasons why these approaches may not help in a power outage. If the datacenter handling back-end operations is also impacted by an outage, mobile won’t help. Plus, if the customers are impacted by the outage, they may choose to be ultra-conservative with their mobile battery power, preferring to save it for emergencies and not to make retail purchases. (Yes, consumers can be so selfish.)

But therein also lies a potential benefit. If a store is powered by a generator, why not flip this around? Offer consumers rows of power outlets for them to charge their phones with while they shop, all under the watchful eye of a security officer who would be taking IDs. (Think airport luggage pickup, but done in a secure manner.) “Plug in and charge while you shop.” Not a bad banner for the front of the store during a power outage.

Sajor cited his own personal experience during Irene purchasing a power generator from Home Depot online, with plans to later pick it up in-store. He was impressed with two storm-related moves from Home Depot. First, the store quickly sold out of generators and store employees resisted the temptation to sell his already-paid-for unit, despite the fact that it was sitting in plain view of customers with his name clearly on it.

He wondered why people didn’t claim to be him—his name was quite visible—and pick it up. Sajor had to produce extensive identification to pick it up, ultimately waiting for the store to call his wife at home and let her verify him, too.

The second impressive aspect of Home Depot’s weather efforts was some IT magic. The chain rerouted all generators destined for non-hurricane areas and sent them to flood-ravaged communities. “The fact that Home Depot could dynamically influence stock in flight,” he said, was surprising and impressive.

To be clear, this is not intended to suggest E-Commerce and M-Commerce as emergency options. Yes, those are wonderful options always. But in a community hit hard by a natural disaster, waiting for the UPS or FedEx delivery days from now is hardly the solution. This type of situation brings communities together. It’s a time when they see their retailers as fellow boarded-up victims or as saviors to sell them what they truly need. (Note: I hope it doesn’t need to be said that increasing prices during such a disaster is a remarkably bad idea.)


advertisement

One Comment | Read Would Mobile Have Helped Retailers During Hurricane Irene’s Power Outages?

  1. Mobile Guy Says:

    If this places mobile devices in the hands of the employees, that would further reduce potential POS friction and allow for more in-store sales under these circumstances.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.