Amazon Cuts Calif. Deal—Now It’s Fighting For Online Sales Taxes

Written by Frank Hayes
September 8th, 2011

Amazon cut a deal with California politicians on Wednesday (Sept. 7) to block the state’s online sales-tax law for at least a year. The political deal buys Amazon and other online retailers a year’s respite from the online tax in California. But it also effectively guarantees that, one way or another, all E-tailers will be collecting state sales tax 16 months from now.

Under the deal, Amazon and a coalition of brick-and-mortar retailers have until July 31, 2012, to lobby Congress to pass a bill authorizing states to collect online taxes. If the federal law passes, California won’t require E-tailers to start collecting sales tax from customers in the state until January 2013. If Congress doesn’t act, online tax collection will be required starting in September 2012.

The agreement ends a political war between Amazon and the California legislature, which passed an online sales-tax law that took effect in July. But in the wake of the law, no online retailers applied for permits to collect the taxes, and Amazon launched a $5 million signature-gathering effort for a referendum to repeal the law.

That, in turn, led lawmakers to try to repeal the law that Amazon was attempting to repeal and replace it with a nearly identical law that wouldn’t be subject to repeal through California’s referendum process—an effort that failed to get enough votes this week, forcing the compromise.

But the deal also effectively signals an end to a string of political and court battles in New York, Illinois, Connecticut, Rhode Island, North Carolina, Arkansas and Colorado. Amazon—which California calculated would be responsible for delivering half the online sales taxes the state expects to collect—is now in a race to get Congress to authorize online sales taxes. And unless the rest of the pure-play E-tailers decide to fight it, Amazon will drag them all along in its slipstream.

The result is certainly not guaranteed. The short timetable will pit Amazon, traditional retailers and sales-tax-hungry state governments against politicians who will oppose the tax authority on anti-tax principle, during the run-up to a presidential election. Yeah, that’s sure going to be pretty.

Among E-tailers, the most likely candidates to pick up the anti-online-sales-tax banner that Amazon has dropped are eBay and But eBay cut its own deal last month with California—the online auction giant’s home state—to excuse it from having to collect sales taxes. Even though physical-world auctioneers in California must collect sales taxes, it will be up to eBay sellers to apply for permits and collect the taxes, and then only if they do $1 million or more in sales to California residents.

As for Overstock, while the online retailer has partnered with Amazon in lawsuits against online tax laws in New York and other states, the company says it doesn’t like the idea of federally authorized online sales taxes either. But whether Overstock has sufficient political heft to lead a fight on its own remains to be seen.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.