advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

Burger King, Jeep Tweet-Hacks Show It’s Time For A Social Kill Switch

Written by Frank Hayes
February 20th, 2013

The Twitter takedown of Burger King (NYSE:BKW) on Monday (Feb. 18), followed by an almost identical attack on Jeep’s Twitter account the next day, underlines a basic problem with social media: It’s almost never under a retailer’s control. It’s not just that interacting online with customers is inherently unpredictable. The key social media sites themselves—Twitter, Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) and others—are always under someone else’s control, and a chain is just another user.

That means when a retailer’s social media presence is under attack, the difference between being down for more than an hour (like Burger King) or just 10 minutes (like Jeep) can be a matter of setting up the equivalent of a kill switch—and that’s going to take some work.

It’s still not clear exactly how either site was taken over by anonymous hackers—whether the attackers got in through an actual breach in Twitter or just managed to acquire passwords to the Burger King and Jeep accounts. (That may become clearer over the next few weeks because, if it is an actual Twitter breach, we can expect to see a stream of copycat attacks.)

In Burger King’s case, after its Twitter page was replaced with one featuring McDonald’s (NYSE:MCD) branding and the account tweeted that the chain had been sold to McDonald’s, it took more than an hour for Burger King to notice, contact Twitter and disable the account, before resetting passwords and restoring the site.

The following day, Jeep’s Twitter page was replaced with Cadillac branding (including a Cadillac painted with a McDonald’s logo, according to some reports) and tweets claiming Jeep had been sold to General Motors’ (NYSE:GM) Cadillac division. But the Jeep takeover only lasted 10 minutes before it was cut off.

How was Jeep able to cut off the attackers so fast? “According to the folks at Twitter, they were able to assist us more quickly because they were better prepared as a result of the previous day’s attack on Burger King’s account,” said Jeep Spokesperson Ed Garsten. “It also was vital that our social media agency was quick to detect the issue and respond to it immediately.”

In other words, Jeep got lucky because it was second in line. That will also help any retailers hit by a similar Twitter attack in the next few days.

Then things will go back to normal, Twitter will no longer be on high alert and the usual impossible-to-contact-anyone situation will return—until the next round.

Part of the problem is with how retailers think about social media.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.