advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Domino’s Site Crashes During Pizza Giveaway, Chain Blames “Bad Apple” Customers

September 21st, 2011

Was it highly anticipatable that something like this would have happened? It’s a very difficult decision, because it seems absurd to instruct marketers to make their campaigns anything less than as powerful as possible. But with sites at risk of crashing entirely, it might be an instruction that you might have to give.

Ironically, the site crashed on the same day that Domino’s issued a statement saying it sold $1 million—in one week—through its new iPhone/iPod Touch application, which itself is only three months old. It wouldn’t say which week the $1 million in revenue was logged.

A million dollars of orders in a week is decent for any mobile app. Given that Domino’s sells about $125 million worth of pizzas during a typical week—and it’s not clear if those mobile sales were on top of existing sales or if the app was merely cannibalizing sales, shifting phone orders to mobile (which would still be a very good thing, profit-wise)—the impact is not clear.

But the mobile statement Domino’s issued had an interesting line, attributed to the chain’s chief marketing officer, Russell Weiner: “The most exciting thing about reaching these accomplishments so quickly is that the Domino’s App is still in its infancy.” The implication of the comment was that if it’s doing this well now—after a mere three months—imagine how well it will do down the road. That’s not necessarily a fair prediction.

With any new mobile app—especially one with a lot of bells and whistles and maybe pepperoni—there’s going to be the gee-whiz factor. The novelty of the app may attract a lot of people. The question is whether the functionality and convenience of the app keeps those users using it six months later. That’s why it’s important to know which week it was. We have a hint in that the chain said it had made a total of $1 million in revenue from the mobile app in the first 28 days since the app’s June 8 launch. Therefore, the $1 million-in-one-week week has to have happened since mid-July. The date is a little fuzzy, because the app was launched June 8, but customers weren’t told about it for a week. It seems likely that the first week—before it was announced—would have had minimal traffic.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.