This is page 2 of:

Macy’s Pledging Item-Level RFID Chain-Wide By 2013

September 28th, 2011

Still, it wouldn’t be the effortless instant search described in limitless item-level RFID PowerPoint presentations. “You’d have to have the gun, know the UPC and you’d need to generally know which rack” the garment is likely in, Connell said.

The launch will officially start next year and “will be in size-intensive replenishment categories such as men’s furnishings, intimate apparel, men’s slacks, denim and women’s shoes in each store nationwide. Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s private brands are included in the initiative,” said a Macy’s statement. “This will enable multiple counts throughout the year compared with the current practice of taking a physical inventory once a year.”

Greg Buzek, president of the IHL retail research group, said he thought it was a good move, if not a bit overdue. “I guess my first reaction is that it is about time,” he said. “RFID at the item level has tremendous benefits, particularly for retailers that focus on soft-goods products, because issues of interference that plague many hard goods and food items do not exist. Using the technology to streamline the supply chain, to locate products within the store that are on the wrong shelves, in dressing rooms, while providing a better inventory account has a direct impact on sales.”

IHL has reported 25 percent item sales boosts “for tagged items in certain categories simply because there is a better chance the inventory is on the rack where the customer is looking for it. Because these are passive tags, however, the actual benefits will come down to store execution of fixing any issues at the store level,” Buzek said. “Combined with a strong task-management platform, this installation can provide a powerful return for Macy’s and a competitive advantage in in-stock position over its competitors.”

On the other hand, given that the goal—after two years—is to impact only 30 percent of products, that limits how far this can go. “For example, it can’t be a replacement for EAS,” Buzek said. “It’s really just a large-scale beta test.”

Given that much of the financial heavy-lifting here will be shouldered by manufacturers, Macy’s had to persuade quite a few of its product makers to buy in.

Connell said the core of his argument was pointing out that item-level RFID was very much in the interests of manufacturers, because the more accurate inventories mean that more purchases will be made—and made faster—to replenish products. “When you sit there and describe why this is a good thing to do, that it’s as good for the vendor as it is for Macy’s,” resistance melts, he said. “As our sales go up, our purchases go up.”

Of course, the real ROI argument is that Macy’s won’t be alone. If lots of other major chains join in—which seems likely—then the manufacturer’s investment becomes a no-brainer.

Therefore, much of this arrangement truly needs other chains to play, too. That’s certainly not out of the question, given recent item-level efforts from Wal-Mart, and J.C. Penney and LL Bean along with some creative RFID moves from Aldi.

It’s a delicate balancing act, as it will take many of the top-tier chains to make this fully profitable for suppliers. If everyone plays, this works. If just a few play, well, it really depends on who those few are. If they are sufficiently large and—this is even more critical than size—sufficiently diversified product-wise, it might work with 10 or 12 major players.

Someone has to go first in a big way. Macy’s move is the brave and the smart approach. The question remains: Will it be the right approach? And when the answer to that question relies solely on the actions of your most direct competitors, that can make for some very sleepless item-level nights.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.