advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

Microsoft’s Marketing Madness: This Is Not The Way To Do An In-Store Mobile Promo

Written by Frank Hayes
March 29th, 2012

The collision between in-store, mobile and social is generating some wild and bizarre promotional ideas that go way beyond sales, coupons and loyalty programs. And those experiments risk lackluster results. (How many sales are rung up because of those Shopkick scavenger hunts, anyway?) But Microsoft’s ill-fated foray into unusual in-store marketing this week demonstrated that if a promotion is badly enough conceived, it can actually generate negative results.

In fact, Microsoft’s effort produced a bad-results hat trick: It didn’t drive more store (or mobile or online) traffic, it wasted time for both store associates and customers, and it made the retailer look bad.

The latest round of Microsoft’s “Windows Phone Challenge,” which was launched on March 22, invited anyone with a non-Windows smartphone to come to a Microsoft Store and compete in one of five challenges—all of which were designed to be won by Windows phones. The goal: Beat the associate with the Windows phone at an associate-selected challenge—say, uploading a picture to Facebook or checking the weather in two cities—and the customer wins a $1,000 laptop. The losing customers got the chance to trade in their old phones for new Windows phones.

The highest profile problem arose on March 25, when a customer at the Santa Clara, Calif., store won his check-the-weather challenge mostly by luck—he happened to have weather apps for two cities already running on his phone’s screen—but was then told by first the associate and then the store manager that he hadn’t really won. It took a blogosphere-wide stink and some intervention from a manager in Redmond to get the winning customer his laptop prize.

That’s what got all the negative attention, but it wasn’t the only problem with the promotion. Some customers who showed up didn’t care about the challenge—they only wanted to trade in their aging iPhones, BlackBerries or Android phones. But they still had to wait in line, in some cases for an hour or more, to take a challenge they knew they wouldn’t win, just so they could swap for a new Windows phone. That wasted their time, and it wasted associates’ time managing the line and running the challenges.

Worse still, while those people were in line, they couldn’t look at products or buy anything in the store. Those would-be customers may have been brought in by the promotion, but after an hour in line how likely were they to spend more time in the store? And how much new traffic does that count as?

Then there was the traffic that did want to play to win—but only wanted to play, not to buy. It shouldn’t be a big surprise that the challenges were designed so no one would win the laptop, and the associates working the challenges were reportedly briefed so they’d pick a challenge that the customer’s phone would lose. (For example, iPhones have fast cameras, so no take-a-picture-and-upload-it for them.) This was a marketing stunt; of course the odds were in the store’s favor.

But how smart was it to ask for a photo of losing contestants next to a “Windows Phone smoked my Android” sign? Yep, that’ll sure encourage those contestants to return as regular customers.

And how smart was it to hold a contest in which the only way for customers to win was to make Microsoft’s products look inferior?


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.