advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

The Backward World Of Loyalty: “I’d Like A VCR, A Wired Phone and a Plastic Loyalty Card, Please”

February 7th, 2012

That is not to say that each of these vendors will not have an important role to play in the overall loyalty approach; they will all play a critical part. My contention is that they are not currently set up to be successful in offering the entire package and here is why.

A great loyalty approach requires myriad functionality that is not readily available from the current technology providers, including:

  • A great campaign management system with the ability to:
    • Regionalize loyalty campaigns.
    • Allow franchisees to create their own campaigns.
    • Interact with internal systems such as store meta-databases and BI systems to enrich the campaigns and remove the requirement for duplicating data across several systems.
    • Interact with a creative system that provides a consistent look and feel across all platforms.
  • The ability to enrich the customer profile data with data from the major social networks.
  • The ability to load and redeem coupons electronically.
  • The ability to leverage geo-location services.
  • The ability to customize the program to interact with users how they want (via text, E-mail, mobile app, social network, etc.).

In a very informal survey of a few friends, all of them said they would much rather provide a retailer with a cell-phone number than carry around a piece of plastic (many said they have the clerk look up their loyalty account by providing their cell-phone number). There is an argument that says using the plastic card speeds up purchase transactions and, for high-volume shops such as restaurants, the few seconds saved by swiping a card can be significant. But for most retailers, the time to enter a phone number versus swipe a card will far outweigh the rate of adoption with their customers.

I would argue that a well-built loyalty package will really let each customer determine the best way to interact with the brand. Do they want to check-in on Foursquare or Facebook? No problem. Do they want to use your mobile app? Sure thing. Do they want to provide their phone number to the cashier or to a small device at checkout? Easy-peasy.

The other big factor is that loyalty programs and coupons (electronic and mobile) are rapidly starting to merge together. You may want to provide a customer with a bounce-back coupon after a purchase. You should be able to automatically “load” that coupon into that customer’s loyalty account and then track its redemption when the coupon is used. This removes the need for customers to have to carry physical coupons or offers, while providing the retailer with valuable information about redemption of certain offers because each coupon would be unique.

Another important factor of the next generation of loyalty platforms will be the ability to interact with a purchase transaction in real time. Did an infrequent customer with a high Klout score just purchase a promotional item? What if you provided a “surprise and delight” discount (or free product/service/food) to that customer in hopes that her network of followers on the social networks will see a tweet about her great experience?

What do you think? If you disagree (or even, heaven forbid, agree), please comment below or send me a private message. Or check out the Twitter discussion on @todd_michaud.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.