advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Visa’s Mobile Magic: Using POS As A Beacon

May 11th, 2011

Realistically, the coupon program is a side effect. This approach is really a way of following customers around—or leading them from one retailer to the next.

Visa says it plans to expand the service, now that it has worked the bugs out with Gap. And why not? The hard part is tracking the customers who have signed up for the program. Sending mobile coupons is trivial—and better still, a text message doesn’t require a smartphone. Adding more retailers just means having to decide which retailers’ offers to text to a customer or possibly calculating where the customer is likely to go next.

Visa is also in a position to offer Google-like services, such as restaurant recommendations—except that Visa knows everywhere a cardholder eats using the card, what restaurants a cardholder has stopped eating at and how much the cardholder likes to spend, so it has much more complete data for making suggestions.

And Visa is even in a position to offer non-retail services to cardholders, like sending reminders to head for the airport when a customer has bought a plane ticket using the card—but not sending a reminder if the customer already appears to be at the airport.

What about other location-related services? If Visa can stalk card-using customers just as effectively as Apple or Google when they’re out shopping (but without leaving a lot of location data on a smartphone, the way Apple and Google do), how long will it be before Visa starts identifying the shopping patterns of consumers and selling that information to retailers?

That’s a long way from interchange. But it may be Visa’s unavoidable future. Market leaders tend to stick too long with the business model that took them to the top. Visa has been spreading investments around in the mobile-payments space (for example, with Square, Ecrio and Monitise), but it’s pretty clear that—like everyone else—Visa doesn’t know what will eventually gut its interchange business.

Retailers love the idea of a serious competitor that will force interchange rates down. It hasn’t come along yet. But Visa certainly believes that, sooner or later, it will.

The irony is, the card company may not have to wait. If it can make enough from location-based services, Visa might actually be able to squeeze out competition by reducing interchange rates in exchange for services that retailers actually appreciate. If that happens, Visa will have gutted its own interchange business.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.