This is page 2 of:

When Is A Franchisee’s IT Obsolete?

January 19th, 2011

That’s right—this is a lawsuit over an IT problem that has since been fixed. In that respect, Burger King’s legal threat has already gotten the desired result.

But Burger King is still trying to get a court order to shut down the 10 restaurants. And, as is so often the case in lawsuits, that attempt has turned out to be a risky road. First, six of Cabrera’s stores had to be removed from the shutdown list because there’s no clear evidence that their POS units were more than 10 years old—which would mean they hadn’t violated the Burger King upgrade mandate.

Then Burger King couldn’t offer direct evidence that the remaining four stores had POS systems that were at least 10 years old. And now, after almost a year of preliminary wrangling, Burger King has failed to convince the judge that a technical mandate to replace POS systems is the same as declaring those units “obsolete” under the terms of the contract as it was originally written.

That may mean it’s time for all franchisors to consider sharpening up the language of their franchise agreements. No, that’s not IT’s department. But it’s much easier to demonstrate that kitchen equipment is obsolete or faulty than it is to show that IT equipment falls into that category. If a broiler can’t be used to produce products on the chain’s standard menu, it’s obviously obsolete, and the chain can credibly threaten to put the franchisee out of business.

But if a POS terminal works fine and can sell anything on the menu but doesn’t fit into the franchise’s IT roadmap, it’s less obvious that a judge or jury will think it’s obsolete—and that’s going to make the nuclear option harder to use.

Of course, Burger King has another problem too: It may want to make an example of a franchisee who dragged his feet on a required IT upgrade. But to shut down that franchisee’s stores with an injunction requires showing that Burger King has been irreparably harmed.

That’s a tough sell. After all, the franchisee did install the new POS units only a few months behind schedule and has actually been using other technology required by Burger King’s roadmap years ahead of schedule. No one is suggesting that the franchisee isn’t following Burger King’s food-preparation or service procedures, or that there are health or safety issues, or that the franchisee isn’t able to offer the full Burger King menu, as some recent Burger King lawsuits against other franchisees have alleged.

No, this one’s just about IT—and it’s about an IT problem that has been fixed.

“Other than the alleged breach of the Franchise Agreement related to the untimely compliance with the new POS policy that has already been cured, it appears that Defendant’s restaurants continue to operate properly with no harm whatsoever to the goodwill of the Burger King brand,” the judge wrote. “On the other hand, an injunction would essentially put Defendant out of business and cause hundreds of people to lose their jobs. Thus, in light of the fact that this case is a very close call on the merits, balance of hardships and public policy weigh against injunctive relief.”

Translation: “You want me to put him out of business for this? Sorry, Burger King, you’ll have to convince a jury to do that.”


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.