advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

Is Target Trying To Become Amazon For Cooks?

Written by Frank Hayes
March 19th, 2013

Target (NYSE:TGT) is quietly getting into the E-Commerce infrastructure business. The $68 billion chain announced last Thursday (March 14) that it is buying online cookery sites CHEFS Catalog and Cooking.com, both of which sell kitchenware and utensils. But Cooking.com also provides the backend for several high-profile celebrity cooking websites — and Target apparently intends to keep its hands off that business as long as it keeps growing.

Keep in mind that it’s barely a year and a half since Target could barely keep its own newly built E-Commerce site running, after a decade of having its E-Commerce operations run by Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). That’s fresh in the minds of Target E-Commerce execs, so if there’s any chain that can see an advantage to becoming a mini-Amazon for cooking websites, it’s Target.

The deal by Target is odd in several ways. One is that Target will essentially leave the two kitchenware E-tailers alone—they’ll retain their brands and even go into a wholly owned subsidiary all their own, instead of being digested into the $68-billion chain. Another is that Target’s minimal announcement of the acquisitions didn’t even mention the most interesting parts, including connections with celebrity chefs and a significant non-retail business.

Is Target trying to bury this news? Probably. And possibly with good reason: If you’re trying to become the Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) of cooking websites, you don’t want to make too much noise early on.

The deal itself, which Target announced on March 14 and plans to finalize by mid-April, will give Target the two E-Commerce websites along with a brick-and-mortar outlet store operated by CHEFS in Colorado Springs, Colo. The new subsidiary will be run by current CHEFS CEO Tim Littleton, while Cooking.com CEO Tracy Randall will become a Target consultant. Both those sites will continue to sell kitchen merchandise.

But Cooking.com isn’t just an E-tailer. It also provides the back-end E-Commerce platform for more than a dozen branded online cookery stores bearing the names of Rachael Ray, Emeril Lagasse, Paula Deen, Pillsbury, Betty Crocker and the Food Network. That’s a lot of high-profile names for Target to ignore.

But, of course, Target isn’t ignoring those big names. Target already has products from those celebrities in its stores. What it gets from this deal is, in effect, the chance to collect rent from their E-Commerce sites—and the opportunity to collect even more rent from any other cooking-oriented websites it can sell on using Cooking.com’s platform (and the built-in endorsement of celebrity cooking sites that already use the platform).

For Target’s E-Commerce execs, the “Powered by Cooking.com” logo on those celebrity-chef sites must feel very reminiscent of the decade Target spent with Amazon’s logo plastered on its online operations. The chain ended that deal with Amazon less than two years ago, and what followed was a series of spectacular stumbles as Target launched its own site until it finally found its footing.

Now Target has put itself in the Amazon position—owning the platform, collecting the rent, even having the history to remind its cookware tenants that building their own E-Commerce systems is hard, dangerous and probably more expensive than it’s worth.

It’s a clever strategy. And the best part for Target is that it doesn’t have to find arcane omnichannel synergies, much less actually corner the cooking market, to make this work. It’s selling a service to other retailers—and it makes money as long as it can keep collecting a piece of the action.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.