advertisement
advertisement

This is page 3 of:

Put To The Test, U.K. Retailers Suffer Merged-Channel Hiccups

June 27th, 2012

VERY
The experience with Very.co.uk was surprisingly different from the one with Asos, despite both retailers using Collect+. Very was one of the first online retailers to offer click-and-collect to the Collect+ network of local convenience stores. The Shop Direct-owned retailer said that 18 percent of all orders over Christmas last year were delivered to the network. And 10,000 products are available via Collect+, according to the Very homepage. However, it took five attempts to find a product with the Collect+ option.

User experience: Customers have to register for the ‘deliver to a Collect+ store’ option, but the choice is clearly highlighted. There were five stores within one mile of the selected postcode, the closest at 0.59 miles.

Communication: Confirmation of the order was instant and notification of dispatch followed promptly via E-mail and text message, with a clear reminder of forms of identification to bring to collect the product. Confirmation of delivery, however, arrived three days later, despite the retailer’s promise of next-day delivery.

Pick-up: At the East London corner store, initially staff were indifferent to the collection request. A more helpful member finally took the order reference, but after repeatedly claiming that the reference was wrong, realized that the Collect+ system was down and advised to call Very customer service or come back later.

Verdict: Using a different store from the Asos order highlighted the lack of control retailers have over face-to-face customer interaction when using the Collect+ service. The customer service was poor, and staff did not seem concerned about a customer leaving empty handed. Such experiences reflect badly on the retailer, and a shopper might think twice about using the service again.


HOUSE OF FRASER
In September 2011, House of Fraser launched its ‘buy and collect’ service in response to customer demand. The service is free and available seven days a week. Any order placed before 3pm will be available as early as noon the next day, and the department store guarantees that the ordered item will be in stock. For stores in Belfast in Northern Ireland and Dundrum in the Irish Republic, the retailer requires 48 hours, while its Cirencester store currently doesn’t allow pick-up on Sundays. The ‘buy and collect’ logo is prominent on the homepage and throughout navigation.

User experience: House of Fraser has clearly thought through navigation, and the checkout process was smooth.

Pick-up: The second-floor collection area in Oxford Street’s House of Fraser is clearly signposted throughout the store. Customer services staff located the package quickly.

Communication: House of Fraser communicated in clear, neatly designed and informative E-mails, making the collection process very easy.

Verdict: The speed of House of Fraser’s communication and product availability was impressive. Collecting items from House of Fraser ‘buy and collect’ is as exciting as such an experience can be. Signs on escalators and shop floors point the way in bright House of Fraser livery. The collection area was prominent and gleaming, rather than a back-of-store afterthought.


SAINSBURY’S
Sainsbury’s click-and-collect service promises delivery of general merchandise to a store of choice from 4pm the next day, if the order is placed by 2pm. The supermarket has rolled out the service to more than 800 shops during the past year, and last year Christmas week was the retailer’s strongest for its click-and-collect offer, with almost 75 percent of online general merchandise orders made via this channel.

User experience:Click-and-collect is clearly signposted on product pages, integrating it effectively with other delivery options. A Sainsbury’s Local, 0.4 miles from the selected postcode, was among the pick-up options, and there were four available locations within a mile, and 14 under two miles.

Communication: Instant E-mail confirmation of the order was followed by a notification of delivery the next day—ahead of schedule. It also gave clear instructions of what documentation and ID to take to pick up the order.

Pick-up: Customers collecting items have to join the checkout to ask staff to locate parcels. However, staff were helpful and located the item quickly.

Verdict:The inclusion of local stores makes the service very convenient. If only it also offered it on groceries.

—Retail Week is the U.K.’s leading provider of retail industry news and insight, top retail jobs, key retail market reports and data, from across the entire retail sector. Visit www.retail-week.com for the latest breaking news, views and analysis on the U.K. retail sector.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.