advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

Technical Debt Is Destroying IT

Written by Todd L. Michaud
June 2nd, 2010

Franchisee Columnist Todd Michaud has spent the last 16 years trying to fight IT issues, with the last six years focused on franchisee IT issues. He is currently responsible for IT at Focus Brands (Cinnabon, Carvel, Schlotzsky’s and Moe’s Southwestern Grill).

A disease in this country is slowly destroying businesses from the inside out. Often misdiagnosed, symptoms of this devastating virus can be found in 95 out of 100 companies. This disease is called “Technical Debt,” and it’s the primary cause of IT failures in the last two decades. Put simply, Technical Debt is any technology decision that has a long-term negative impact on the business.

Although it would seem obvious that companies would want to avoid accumulating Technical Debt, I would say that, in some businesses, as many as 8 out of 10 technology decisions carry some level of Technical Debt. As Technical Debt accumulates, the results can be devastating.

Technical Debt has been classified into three different strains:

  • Orange Virus: Implementing technology not in alignment with long-term goals
  • Green Virus: Over-purchasing technology
  • Red Virus: Under-purchasing Technology

The Technical Debt Orange Virus, or technology not in alignment with long-term goals, affects technology decisions that are made considering only (or mostly) the short-term advantages the approach will provide. These decisions are often made at a department or region level and may be considered “one-offs” from the overall enterprise architecture (should one exist). Often developed by internal staff (possibly not even from IT), these systems rarely come with a business case that would hold its own weight under close inspection.

Other symptoms that indicate your organization has been infected with the Technical Debt Orange Virus include:

  • Replacing an existing system with no significant, quantifiable benefits (common after a functional leadership change)
  • Lack of documentation or training available for the system (possibly an orphan of an employee who has left the company)
  • Duplicate data that already exists in other authoritative systems (often because “we don’t trust the data in that ‘other’ system”)
  • Lack of enterprise-class infrastructure (possibly installed on a workstation underneath someone’s desk)
  • Lack of integration with other systems within the same functional area or within a business process (often requiring people to take reports from one system and manually enter them into another)
  • More than 60 percent of the IT staff’s time is spent on maintaining the current systems

Organizations that have been infected with the Technical Debt Orange Virus will often find a person with the role of “Application Portfolio Manager.” The Orange Virus can be caused by the irritation around the merger of two business units or companies.

Often, applications or systems left out of an overall integration plan–and left unattended–will manifest into the Technical Debt Orange Virus. Similar results have been known to happen upon executive leadership change, where one system is abandoned (but never really retired) while a new system is put in place.

By implementing technology that is not in alignment with the long-term goals and vision, the organization is assuming Technical Debt. In most cases, the cost of supporting these systems over time far outweighs the benefit from implementing the system in the first place.

The Technical Debt Green Virus, or over-purchasing technology, is often found in larger companies where several different business units utilize a shared IT staff. Some of the symptoms of the Green Virus include requirements that contain the words “we might,” “someday” or “we hope.”

Functionality Surplus (when the system does considerably more than the needs of the business unit) and Bloated Budgets are also symptoms.

Additional symptoms of the Technical Debt Green Virus include:

  • Annual maintenance costs for a single piece of software are higher than an IT administrator’s yearly salary
  • The implementation of a single brand of software takes longer than 12 months
  • Lack of documented requirements forced the purchase of a system that could handle any need
  • A small number of business requirements that necessitated the leap from a midsize approach to an enterprise approach were never validated with the business for their criticality

Often, the Technical Debt Green Virus can be seen in organizations that buy enterprise-level software for medium sized business. (Does a 100-person single-building company even qualify for an “enterprise” resource planning system?”) The purchase of this system is often made at the recommendation of an outside consulting company.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.