advertisement
advertisement

Best Buy RedLaser Trial Just Shows One Store’s Stock

Written by Evan Schuman
September 20th, 2012

Best Buy on Monday (Sept. 17) described a trial it’s doing with eBay’s RedLaser, where it uses in-store Wi-Fi triangulation coupled with near-the-store GPS tracking to confirm that a shopper has walked into a Best Buy. Once confirmed, it pops up a special version of RedLaser’s app focused solely on Best Buy. The traditional RedLaser app—which will still be available to those shoppers in a Best Buy—did a more global product search among all retailers.

What’s impressive is that this approach is three levels deeper than what RedLaser has been used to. It goes beyond limiting its results to Best Buy, focusing instead on what that specific Best Buy store sells and then limiting the results to what that specific Best Buy store has in stock. This means Best Buy’s APIs are sharing real-time inventory data. As Walmart learned recently with its new site search engine, limiting results (such as for just Walmart versus Amazon and its partners or even all of Google) makes for a much more complicated and demanding search. And all are trying to avoid the nightmare that Home Depot experienced with its Google Maps trial, when the app kept sending customers who were inside Home Depot using a Home Depot app to—we couldn’t make this up—the local Lowe’s.

RedLaser General Manager Rob Veres said this functionality, called In-Store Experience, addresses what had been an unfortunate result of performing global searches. “To date, RedLaser has been used widely in local stores. But often we just tell the customer where else to buy a product,” Veres said.

He added that the app will also show local discounts and any service specials (such as installation). Veres touched on a nice twist that Best Buy is doing with its local inventory, too. “We can even show open box inventory available at any particular Best Buy store, where the customer can get a big discount on a product that has been previously opened,” he said.

The app was launched for iPhone only. It hasn’t been determined when an Android version will be offered, although a statement quoted Veres as saying that version will be available “very soon,” said eBay spokesperson Amanda Coffee.

Beyond eBay’s first experiment with geofencing, the Best Buy trial also integrates its CRM program. Shoppers can scan their loyalty cards and RedLaser will store the cards and then use that data to flag special discounts for each particular customer.

This presumably works both ways, with Best Buy now able to learn exactly which products any customer scans. In turn, this gets closer to the “knowing what the shopper is thinking about, what they are even casually interested in” nirvana.

Some have compared what eBay’s RedLaser is trying with Best Buy to ShopKick (which also happens to work with Best Buy, giving Best Buy a wonderful opportunity to compare the ROI of the two apps side by side). Although both are in similar territory, the instant pop-up RedLaser has created for Best Buy could give the chain an edge if—and this is key—it truly works to consistently deliver attractive offers through RedLaser.

An advantage for ShopKick is, oddly enough, its use of proprietary audio signals to identify the store to the app. RedLaser’s reliance on Wi-Fi could be problematic, with not all retailers being so fond of offering customer Wi-Fi. And a deal that Macy’s cut with Muzak-owner Mood Media—which has already placed audio speakers in umpteen of the largest retail chains—to send the ShopKick signal over those existing speakers could mean a further edge over RedLaser’s Wi-Fi approach.

But the basics that Best Buy is exploring in this trial—limiting items displayed to a specific store’s real-time inventory—has arguably huge potential. And if confirming that a shopper is inside a specific store is the most difficult challenge RedLaser faces, it should consider itself very lucky.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.