advertisement
advertisement

Dick’s Sporting Goods Takes A Different View Of Online Stats

Written by Evan Schuman
March 12th, 2013

In a wonderful E-Commerce example of the time-honored “different strokes for different folks,” executives at both Dick’s Sporting Goods (NYSE:DKS) and Macy’s (NYSE:M) saw the identical trend: Online, in-store and mobile sales are becoming hopelessly tangled. Macy’s solution on February 26: Stop reporting online numbers. Dick’s solution on Monday (March 11): Break those numbers out even more.

Here’s how similarly both chains view the problem. On February 26, Macy’s CFO Karen Hoguet said: “Candidly, it’s getting so hard to know what’s a store sale and what’s a mobile sale and what’s Internet. It’s getting harder to figure out the lines between them.” On March 11, Dick’s CEO Edward Stack said: “We are making this reporting change because, as we build out our omni-channel platform, it is becoming apparent that the traditional sales channels are overlapping with the digital space and that providing comp sales on a combined basis will be more meaningful.”

But by “combined” Stack means that online numbers will be explicitly broken out. “We will continue to provide the size of the E-Commerce business as a percentage of total sales,” he said. Stack gave the example that E-Commerce for this quarter was 8.6 percent of total sales, which placed online sales at about $155 million for the quarter.

As Stack stressed through an analysts call, that result reflected an impressive 54.2 percent increase over the identical quarter a year ago.

One other interesting twist cropped up during the call. An analyst asked if much of the online sales increases were coming from areas where there aren’t any stores, on the rationale that when shoppers want something from a national chain and there are no local stores, a Web sale would seem logical. Stack said the results were “mixed,” and then added, “As we open stores in new markets, our E-Commerce penetration goes up pretty dramatically.”

That’s yet another indication of the symbiotic relationship between stores and sites. From an E-Commerce perspective, stores are these nice billboards for online. That’s why E-Commerce in communities that have never seen a store will likely be weak. If shoppers are open to going online, there’s no great reason to not go the Amazon route. No loyalty has been generated, unless the shopper happens to be a transplant from an area where the chain’s stores do exist.

Pier 1 Imports (NYSE: PIR) toyed with this a couple of years ago, discovering that it could get E-Commerce mileage in towns without its stores. But that was when it had to shut down a store. That meant it had an audience of local loyal shoppers, who suddenly couldn’t get to the stores to buy their favorite stuff. It’s very different from a community that never had a store.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.