advertisement
advertisement

Most Retail Sites Shrug Off Cyber Monday Deluge

Written by Fred J. Aun
December 1st, 2009

Cyber Monday came and went with a conspicuous absence of problems at major retailer Web sites. It’s a fact that could mean E-Commerce teams did a good job preparing for the expected onslaught or that the blow was softened because many merchants began running sales earlier in November. That said, the day (Nov. 30) wasn’t error-free. There were some sporadic periods of downtime at Kohls.com, a site that also had problems early on Black Friday.

CVS.com suffered a brief period of slow responsiveness, while Home Depot had a half-hour period of downtime beginning at about 4 A.M. (New York time). VitaminShoppe.com failed to properly process E-mailed discount coupons, and much of Americangirl.com presented visitors with a site-down message during the day.

Dotcom-Monitor noticed a glitch at Bloomingdales’ site during the day. At one point, Bloomingdales.com displayed a message that said something to the effect of ‘Please Stay With Us,’ while the homepage took a long time to load, said Brad Canham, vice president of business development at Dotcom-Monitor. “Their standard response time is less than a half-second, but they did have one thing happen there,” he said.

AlertBot saw minor problems at Kohl’s. “The downtime periods haven’t been that long, but their Web site is still running very slow and timing out from time-to-time,” said Justin Noll, sales and marketing director at AlertBot.

CVS.com suffered problems “relating to its server performance,” said Gareth Evans of U.K.-based monitoring company Sitemorse, which noted that the page response problems started at about 11:45 A.M. New York time. CVS’ “servers were averaging nearly 2 seconds to respond to simple requests for content such as images,” Evans said. “We saw one of the links to one of their pages take longer than 60 seconds to respond,” a situation that worsened to the point where the servers were averaging more than 3 seconds to respond. It soon improved “to a slow, but not terrible, 0.8 of a second.”

Evans said it must be remembered that the response figures “are the average for the requests for each of the elements of the page,” including the HTML, each .gif and .jpg image, and the JavaScript. He said the site was working normally shortly after noon. “This probably relates to heavy load on their Web site,” Evans said. “It didn’t fail, but it creaked for 10 to 15 minutes.”

The VitaminShoppe glitch was a case of digital couponing gone bad. The vitamin chain E-mailed customers 10-percent-off coupons, all set to expire at the end of Monday, but the coupons didn’t work. The coupons “did not process correctly during checkout” and it was “due to a technical error,” the retailer said in an E-mail blast to coupon recipients. The apology E-mail noted that the company was extending the sale to the end of Tuesday (Dec. 1).

AmericanGirl.com had a series of “sorry, site problems” pages up throughout Cyber Monday. The site’s homepage worked fine, but attempts to dig deeper or to buy anything proved fruitless. “To improve your online experience, we’re updating our site,” said the site when shoppers attempted to view items. “This requires the Web site to be temporarily unavailable. We apologize for the inconvenience. Check back soon to enjoy the changes we’ve made.”


advertisement

One Comment | Read Most Retail Sites Shrug Off Cyber Monday Deluge

  1. Web Guy Says:

    I think Mr. Canham is trying to drum up business. No one else reported ANY problems with bloomingdales.com.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.