advertisement
advertisement

Deloitte On Disruptive And Emerging Tech: Welcome To 2006

Written by Frank Hayes
March 23rd, 2011

Disruption just isn’t what it used to be. On Monday (March 21) consulting giant Deloitte issued a report on what it calls 10 “disruptive and emerging technologies” that will be a big deal to big companies over the next 18 months. The list includes cloud computing, software as a service (SaaS), visualization, analytics, social computing, mobile applications, ERP—wait, these are disruptive and emerging? Some of them emerged and did their disrupting decades ago. At this point, they’re about as disruptive as a cash register or a credit card.

It’s always hard for consultants to strike a balance, looking for the sweet spot in technology and trends that all their potential customers haven’t already adopted but are far enough past bleeding-edge status that they’re not a wild-eyed gamble. This time, Deloitte missed that sweet spot by about five years—this list isn’t even interesting. But we’ll be watching closely for next year’s report to see if that newfangled E-mail thing makes Deloitte’s list.


advertisement

2 Comments | Read Deloitte On Disruptive And Emerging Tech: Welcome To 2006

  1. AUtlaw Says:

    Frank, I think you have fallen for the common and easy to make error that, as someone in the industry, you see stuff as old hat. Remember, more than 50 of businesses still dont have a website!! How many of the millions of businesses that exist have the technology listed. Certainly not “most”. Deloittes readers are not StorefrontBacktalk readers.

  2. Evan Schuman Says:

    The story you’re referencing didn’t say that those technologies were not important or valuable. They absolutely are. But when Deloitte labeled them “disruptive and emerging,” that was simply not true. If Deloitte had said that they were important and worthy of strong consideration, we would not have said a word.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.