advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Alibaba CEO Resigns: It’s All About E-Commerce Trust

February 24th, 2011

Maybe that’s exactly the point. Alibaba has been very successful as a trusted middleman—it handles almost 70 percent of China’s business-to-business E-Commerce, and its business is growing at 32 percent a year, according to Analysys International, a research firm in Beijing. Alibaba is also a $318 million company, which means there’s lots of room to grow.

But a little fraud can go a long way in tainting a fast-rising company’s reputation. And Alibaba’s sister company, the consumer E-Commerce portal Taobao, is a billion-dollar business that’s growing even faster. Saying to customers “Fraud? Who cares?” is a very effective way to send them somewhere—anywhere—else.

Burying scandals or security failures or even just operational problems is a common enough practice. Sometimes it’s a calculation: Is the damage from admitting the problem worse than the fallout from hiding it and later getting caught? Sometimes it’s just a matter of culture: Deny everything and hope for the best.

You can get away with that if you don’t depend on customer trust. In a brick-and-mortar store, for example, you can get by without much trust at all. Customers can see what they’re buying. They can walk out the door with it in hand. They can safely assume that if something goes wrong, that big pile of bricks will still be there the next day, and there will be an actual human being behind a physical customer-service desk to listen to a complaint.

True, plenty of customers trust retailers with personal information for CRM programs. Plenty more don’t. And no customer actually has to trust the retailer.

Now contrast that with E-Commerce: No products in hand; no big pile of bricks; no actual human beings in sight. It all depends on trust. And customers are much more likely to trust a big business when they believe the guys at the top will either defend that trust or walk the plank.

Are things really that much more fraud-resistant at Alibaba today? Probably not. The company is still investigating the mess. Rooting out connections to criminal gangs could take years.

But are Alibaba’s customers a little more comfortable knowing that a CEO’s sense of self-preservation is on their side? You can bet they are.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.