advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Apple’s Multi-Multimedia Patent App Could Have A Huge In-Store Impact

August 17th, 2011

That gives associates a better shot at selling the customer exactly what she wants. And it creates an opportunity for a little stealth CRM data collection, because the system could also capture information on all the virtual items that customers bring in. If the customer is showing an item from a competitor’s online store, it’s easy enough to scrape that bit of product ID. Being able to identify what products customers go to other retailers for—especially when customers go elsewhere first—could be especially useful competitive information.

And even if no detailed product data is available, just being able to mix your store’s inventory on a shared screen with the customer’s own shopping list is still likely to deliver results that make the customer happier.

None of that is in Apple’s patent application, of course. It spends its verbiage deep in technical minutiae (“For example, camera may detect a gesture that corresponds to an image sharing command to move an image from the current projected display to another projected display. The image processing software may interpret the gesture viewed by camera to identify the image sharing command. Processor may then retrieve and transmit data corresponding to the image to an electronic device for the other projected display to allow the other electronic device to display the image on its projected display”).

And there’s no guarantee that Apple will ever actually build tiny projectors into its phones and tablets, and then provide the software to make all this work. True, adding pico projectors seems like a reasonable next step to go along with the now-ubiquitous camera in every phone. Then again, Apple seems to have a hard time just building a near-field communication chip into an iPhone. Go figure.

On the other hand, why wait for Apple? Comparing items from different retailers on a single screen is something customers are already doing anyway—that’s just E-Commerce with multiple browser windows open. It’s how your customers already shop. And they already bring images of what they want, and even your competitors’ Web sites, into your store on their phones. They figured out merged-channel shopping years ago.

If you can just identify how to support that in-store—with something more than an “everything you want is on our kiosks” approach—your associates will have just a little better chance to give customers what they want, and keep them coming back into the store.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.