advertisement
advertisement

BidPay Is Back

Written by Evan Schuman
June 15th, 2006

The old BidPay online payment service?which boasted more than 4 million registered users when it shut its doors in December 2005?has relaunched under the umbrella of new owner CyberSource. But the service has been significantly revamped.

CyberSource has a fondness for bargains, especially when the potential acquirees have as little negotiating room as possible. In September 2005, CyberSource swooped in to buy CardSystems Inc., the company that had the distinction of being responsible for what at the time was the worst example of credit-card information theft ever. CardSystems had kept the verification card numbers?which they are supposed to never retain?on file and also kept lots of other credit-card information on file without encryption. (I wonder if some CardSystems managers then took jobs at the Veterans Administration.)

After AmericanExpress and Visa cut its contract with CardSystems, the outfit was facing almost certain bankruptcy. So CyberSource swooped in to make a buyout offer. The offer was initially accepted, but later fell through and biometric company PayByTouch ultimately made the deal.

With BidPay, the company went through hard times and had to shut down in December. How strong a negotiating position is a company that had to shut its doors? This time, CyberSource made the deal and it stuck.

The new company will perform a little differently than its old version. With the new BidPay, for example, users will no longer be able to purchase money orders online. Sellers now pay for the service, in which deposits are made directly to their U.S. bank account. The company said this change was intended to “eliminate the wait associated with money orders.”

Another change, according to CyberSource, is that the new BidPay will be free for buyers. Last year, buyers had been charged a transaction fee. There will also be a BidPay instant payment notification to sellers, which the company said was supposed to minimize shipping lag time.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.