advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Downtime Ugliness At Beauty Site Sephora.com

June 10th, 2009

On the brick-and-mortar front, Sephora is no lightweight, operating about 515 stores in 14 countries. The company, founded in 1969 and established in the U.S. as “Sephora America” in 1998, is a “specialty retailing” subsidiary of LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton, the $24 billion European luxury goods conglomerate. .

In 2006, it became the exclusive beauty product retailer in J.C. Penny stores with a “store within a store” concept and a link between J.C. Penny’s Web site and Sephora.com.

When one takes a look at the Sephora.com uptime and performance record, it’s hard to not see the irony in Sephora’s acknowledgement of the site’s importance: The company points out that Sephora.com ranks as its “largest North American store in terms of sales and selection of products and brands.”

The causes of the outages seem to vary. This week’s issues appeared to be “mostly network related or some other type of connection problem,” that prevented any pinging of the site, Alguacil said. “The reason I think it might be network related is because our servers simply couldn’t connect to their server at all during the recent downtime periods,” he said. “In other words, we didn’t get far enough to get a proper response from their Web server. They could have had a problem on their LAN or their ISP could have had issues. The cause of those problems can be many things, such as damaged cabling and problems with equipment like switches and routers.”

The May downtime appeared to be a “different story,” Alguacil said. The site showed signs of life, but that was limited to the issuing of a cute apology.

The site reported back an internal server error (HTTP error 500) and presented on a status page: “Sorry, gorgeous! Our site is currently having a bad hair day (read: experiencing technical difficulties) due to high traffic volumes. We’ll be back in action—and perfectly polished—ASAP, so check back with us in a few minutes to continue shopping.”

Even when Sephora.com was up and running it often wasn’t performing well. “The site also suffered from a lot of slowdown” during tests that measured response time for HTML code, Alguacil said. He said Pingdom classifies a site as being down if it is completely unreachable, does not load the basic HTML within 30 seconds or responds with an HTTP error code. Alguacil noted the Pingdom system “always performs a double-check before it reports anything as down,” performing an extra test from a different location for confirmation.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.