advertisement
advertisement

E-Commerce Up, Pureplay Online Down

Written by Fred J. Aun
April 28th, 2009

The vast majority of major multi-channel retailers enjoyed increased online sales during the first quarter of 2009, but their success might have come at the expense of smaller, Web-only players that didn’t fare nearly as well. Forrester E-Commerce Analyst Sucharita Mulpuru said the hardest hit pure-play shops were smaller “E-Bayish” E-Tailers that couldn’t compete with price-slashing by the big guns.

“My hypothesis is that, in tough times, consumers stick to brands they know which are the big multi-channel retailers,” Mulpuru said. “Also, those multi-channel retailers are very aggressive with pricing now and they’re discounting aggressively to maintain market share.”

Forrester Research and Shop.org reported that thirteen of 15 major retailers surveyed in early April said their Web sales increased during the quarter when compared to Q1 of 2008. The researchers defined major retailers as those with at least $100 million in Web-based revenue.

The report included some sample comments from those who were surveyed and a number of them revealed a significant degree of anxiety despite the relatively good sales numbers. One store-based, multi-channel retailer said it was enduring a “difficult environment that is creating a self fulfilling event (with) lots of internet retailers discounting items and freight to drive top line revenue at any cost without concern for margin and profitability.”Another, which reported conversion rates being down by 3 percent, said its “online channel is impacted by offline merchandise decisions: narrowed assortments, tighter inventories, no replenishment on select items.”

Meanwhile, comments from the suffering smaller pure-plays included complaints about increased orders for smaller priced items, a large decrease in sales following stock market declines and an intensification of comparison shopping including comparisons of shipping rates and requests for discount coupons.

The numbers showed sales drops for the 23 online-only stores queried by the researchers. The study found that 61 percent of those pure-play E-Tailers saw sales decline or remain flat during the period.

Forrester and Shop.org said 58 percent of the 80 companies responding to the survey said their sales increased during the quarter while 29 percent said sales declined. Thirty three of 48 multi-channel companies (including manufacturers) reported increases in sales.

Overall, U.S. online retail sales increased an average of 11 percent during the quarter, said the report. That’s a good sign, given the state of the economy during the quarter. Another reason for hope, if not joy: The survey found that 44 percent of the retailers experienced sales increases of more than 10 percent compared to Q1 2008.


advertisement

2 Comments | Read E-Commerce Up, Pureplay Online Down

  1. Linda Hemerik Says:

    Aside from the heavy discounts, another possible reason is that more and more big names are now selling overseas, thus increasing their market size. Examples are Saks, Zappos and Hugo Boss. For the smaller E-tailer, international shipping is a lot of hassle with paperwork, going to the post office and charging high international shipping rates.

  2. Fotoconnection Says:

    Being a large etailer, we find that the orders still come but they are for smaller and less expensive goods. Perhaps the big ticket orders are still there and are being swallowed by the bigger guys but you ask us people just arent spending.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.