advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Ebay Using GSI Buy To Move In-Store

March 30th, 2011

Unlike most alternative payment schemes, PayPal won’t have to sell these retailers on a speculative business model or convince banks and payment-card companies to play along. PayPal has customers and a decade-long track record. That helps. It also helps that eBay isn’t a retail competitor, a collection of mobile operators, a phone maker or an operating system creator. Telco infighting and phone-maker dithering don’t inspire confidence among retailers that are already comfortable with plastic.

But having the infrastructure and track record still only gets PayPal (and eBay) a third of the way to making a play for in-store payments this year. A second crucial piece is encouraging PayPal users to use PayPal in brick-and-mortar stores. The third—the piece in the middle—is the stores themselves.

How exactly will that work? PayPal won’t talk specifics about its push into stores. Aside from hiring Kingsborough, all PayPal CEO Scott Thompson—a former Visa executive—will say is that the plan involves a mix of mobile and social. “We’re going with a whole new experience that is different than the traditional card-like experience. That requires us to rebuild the whole infrastructure around point-of-sale,” Thompson told Reuters a few weeks ago.

That sounds a lot like yet another POS technology to sit alongside magstripe swipers, contactless-card readers, Chip-and-PIN slots, 2D barcode scanners and NFC terminals. We’re still waiting to hear which of those not-traditional-card approaches PayPal has in mind.

That brings us finally to Visa and MasterCard. Because right now most PayPal payments eventually go through a conventional payment card account, accepting PayPal just adds another middleman to every transaction. That won’t encourage retailers to make the jump beyond plastic.

The only way for eBay to make PayPal truly worthwhile for retailers is to significantly cut the cost—and that means cutting Visa and MasterCard out of the loop.

That’s not impossible. But if that’s what eBay has in mind, its next big deal should be to buy a bank.


advertisement

3 Comments | Read Ebay Using GSI Buy To Move In-Store

  1. Kenny Says:

    I think you are missing the most important aspect for brick-and-mortar stores, the interchange fees. More precisely the lower interchange fees that PayPal is promising. There are a lot of traditional retailers that are starting to look at other forms of payments in hopes of lessening this expense. It is obvious that this is what will lead to the adoption of PayPal and other forms of payment.

  2. Evan Schuman Says:

    The story in question actually did address the interchange issue (“The only way for eBay to make PayPal truly worthwhile for retailers is to significantly cut the cost”) but, to your point, it didn’t stress it that much. Then again, we have talked about the fee being the most crucial aspect of this a dozen times–and it’s not like most retailers don’t know that already, so not so sure about how much obvious that point should have been made. Interchange (and related costs) ARE the issue. If PayPal gets everything else right but charges as much as or more than Visa does, it won’t work. And if PayPal charges a lot less than the brands, they can get a heck of a lot wrong with everything and STILL win the day. So, yes, we probably should have at the least moved the interchange reference much higher in the story.

  3. Per Anell Says:

    Why would eBay need to buy a bank to cut Visa/MC out of the loop? PayPal already has at least one banking license in Luxembourg.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.