Gift Card Exchange Site Leverage Halts Payroll

Written by Evan Schuman
December 13th, 2008

Gift card exchange site Leverage, which had pushed one of the more creative CRM ideas out there, has laid off its entire workforce and is hoping economic fortunes will improve next year, according to company CEO/Co-Founder Mark Edward Roberts.

"We basically stopped the payroll. Everything has gone into layoff mode," Roberts said, "until we finalize fundraising efforts. We’ve done layoffs, but that’s just a temporary thing. We’re still up and running."

Asked how the Irvine, CA-based company is still functioning without anyone on payroll, Roberts said that he’s been contracting some of the work "overseas." "We just grab whoever is most able to handle it. Most of the technical stuff that we’ve had up is self-sustaining."

The company had 15 employees on the payroll last month, Roberts said, adding that "our employees understand that this economy has made everything tighten up."

The first report—to the best of our knowledge—of the Leverage difficulties came Friday (Dec. 12) in this nicely reported piece in Techcrunch.

Leverage launched in May 2005 and had raised $2 million in angel funding, said the Techcrunch piece, which appropriately added that, under normal circumstances, the holiday season would be a strong selling point for a site like Leverage and that layoffs would have likely waited until January.

Problems Abound

But this plummeting economy is hardly normal and gift cards are getting beaten up especially aggressively as some consumers fear that store closings will make the cards less desirable as gifts.

The gift card site wasn’t shy about pushing its gift card offers however it could, including a nice shark-blood-in-the-water move when Sharper Image went bankrupt back in February.

This is an interesting time for gift cards, and it could prove to be a very favorable period for those retailers willing to change gift card policies to match the climate. The CRM potential for these card exchange efforts is huge; retailers could potentially learn who the consumer is, what that person was given (and chose to give up) and potentially even what the card is eventually used to buy.

But the card exchange site holds that data, and it may or not agree to share that info with individual retailers. In a recent example, Plastic Jungle did a joint deal with Amazon, but the deal excluded such CRM sharing.

The key problems with gift cards today are short expiration dates, reducing value in increments before those expiration dates, limiting them to only in-store purchases and the fear that the chain could go away or that the chain will merely shut down its stores.

MasterCard, American Express and Visa gift cards have good arguments against some of these factors, but they have expiration dates and some charge for adding custom images. But at least those cards are likely to be usable at the most local merchants and are not in imminent risk of being shut down.

Flexibility Means Viability possibly has the strongest overall gift card argument: it is only online, the company is in relatively strong financial health, and its gift cards have no expiration dates at all—nor is there a charge for the cards. Also, Amazon’s multi-million-product inventory makes the company a pretty good choice for an "I have no idea what you’d want" kind of gift.

This week, Amazon tried to boost its program by offering to better—by a tiny amount—what a different gift card exchange site (Plastic Jungle) offers to anyone who wants to trade in some other retailer’s card for an Amazon gift card. The only problem is that Amazon signed off on a news release that mislead consumers about the size of that bonus, indicating that it would pay 105 percent of the cash value of the card without defining the cash value. A consumer would likely assume that—unless something else was specified—a $100 card for a major retailer would have a value of $100. With Amazon’s offer, its value is closer to about $70.

Still, Amazon’s move is another example of where gift cards today can still be a very viable business—if the merchant is willing to be flexible.


One Comment | Read Gift Card Exchange Site Leverage Halts Payroll

  1. Jeff Schaller Says:

    Although your article is factual it does paint all retailers who sell gift cards with the same brush which may make your readers feel all retailer use the same business rules. This of course not accurate.

    For years I have purchased Starbucks cards that have thousands of locations to redeem them both in (US and Globally) and they also have no experiation date. These cards are huge hits for recipients and I can give them with in any denomination I choose.



StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.