advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

GuestView Column: Private Info For Product Discounts. A Faustian Bargain?

July 15th, 2009

Recently, a consortium of marketing entities, including the American Association of Advertising Agencies, the Association of National Advertisers, the Direct Marketing Association, the Interactive Advertising Bureau and the Council of Better Business Bureaus released its “Self-Regulatory Principles for Online Behavioral Advertising.” These voluntary guidelines are intended to help businesses that collect personal information about consumers’ behavioral activities online avoid government regulation of their data collection practices. The principals are as basic as they are inadequate. They include:

• Transparency and control: Companies that collect information for behavioral advertising should provide meaningful disclosures to consumers about the practice and choice about whether to allow the practice. Of course, companies with “privacy policies” would argue that they already do this and that if you don’t like the policy, you can take your business elsewhere. In reality, most people have no idea what data is being collected.

• Reasonable security and limited data retention: Companies should provide reasonable data security measures so that behavioral data does not fall in the hands of unauthorized persons. The devil here is in the details. For example, data should be retained for the minimum amount of time as “necessary for business” or for law enforcement purposes. So the local grocery store will collect and store data about my purchases for as long as they feel they want to, or just in case the cops want it?

• Material changes to privacy policies: Before a company uses behavioral data in a manner that is materially different from promises made when the company collected the data, it should obtain affirmative express consent from the consumer. The problem here is that most online contracts provide that they can be changed by the Web site operator at any time, just by posting the new contract online. This is the antithesis of a contract, where both parties are bound. For example, I recently tried to listen to my XM radio online through the XM Web site. No dice. While I had been paying for the service, XM decided to “enhance” its service by charging more for online access. They changed the contract by simply posting it online. Needless to say I cancelled my service immediately.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.