advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

How To Kill A Business: Let Business Guys Do Technology

August 11th, 2010

It’s all a lot easier when the business people have fewer technical choices.

Standards are supposed to reduce many of those choices. But how do you get everyone to conform to a technical standard? It helps a lot if there’s an 800-pound gorilla in the game–an IBM, a Microsoft, a Wal-Mart–that’s so big other players are dragged along in its wake. Then there’s a single de facto standard for everyone to conform to.

Otherwise, there are official standards created by multivendor committees that meet for years in identical hotel ballrooms. Those standards tend to have so many options and variations that there’s no guarantee any two “standardized” products will work together.

But there are ways of forcing standards to actually reduce choices. The most useful tool: shame. The most useful way of going about it: a “connectathon,” like the ones Sun Microsystems sponsored starting in 1986 to make sure all the products that implemented its Network File System would work together. Sun’s solution was to lock all the vendors in a big hall–er, invite all the vendors into a big hall–and then have them connect their machines to a single network and test how well they worked together.

If something didn’t work, it all happened out in front of competitors. It’s amazing how well shame–and fear of the competition–works to encourage interoperability.

Network products have been tested with connectathons for 25 years. The electronic healthcare records crowd finally turned to a connectathon a few years ago, when it became clear there was no other way to get the fiercely competitive and incompatible vendors to interoperate.

Connectathons work. They should be used a lot more; for example, an RFID connectathon might have cut years and billions off the time and cost of implementing tags.

Of course, not all interoperability is technical. A connectathon might not be able to get telcos to work together effectively on mobile payment, simply because the people who really need to be connected with them in the virtual hall–the retailers–haven’t been invited to the party. At least not yet.

But if everyone is at least on the same solid technical ground, an awful lot of finger pointing vanishes because the technology all (mostly) just works.

And business people have a lot less risk of putting themselves out of business.


advertisement

One Comment | Read How To Kill A Business: Let Business Guys Do Technology

  1. Fabien Tiburce Says:

    Business people shouldn’t have to deal with technology in the first place. Technology should be commoditized, packaged and exposed as a business service. Technologists alone will kill a business just as fast as the other way around. Software, hardware, these are all implementation details. They are and should be irrelevant to most business situations. Business people need reliable services, fully-hosted, maintained turn key solutions. Business needs to focus on value and functional benefits, not cables and routers. This model exists, it’s called Software as a Service and is slowly but surely eclipsing traditional software vendors. SaaS allows business people to do what they do best: business.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.