advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

JCPenney IT “Is A Mess,” Says COO

May 17th, 2012

Kramer also has cover from a truly awful (but not completely unexpected) financial quarter. If you’re going to announce that your IT is completely worthless, that’s tactically the right time to do it.

Still, Kramer’s thorough shredding of his company’s IT reputation is stunning—stunning enough, in fact, that it’s easy to miss something important.

Replacing nearly 500 customized applications with 100 easy-to-maintain applications is going to be very, very expensive. And none of the assembled retail analysts seems to have noticed that JCPenney was essentially announcing a huge IT capital expenditure program.

There’s no way to pare down that IT portfolio. Cleaning up the mess will require wholesale replacement. That will also require a radical simplification of JCPenney’s business processes (which is also on Kramer’s agenda) and all the training that goes along with it.

JCPenney last week halted its sales commission program, which will also require a huge investment to make it work, at the cost of a much less effective sales team until then. And creating a huge opening for Amazon and other e-tailers, as though they needed another one.

And there’s a reason JCPenney was saddled with that portfolio of endlessly patched-up processes and applications: Ordinarily, CIOs simply don’t have the clout to rip everything out and start over. That’s a very pricey proposition, and getting the CEO and the CFO to sign off on it is very rare. And, naturally, if anything goes wrong, it’s the CIO’s head that will roll.

Everyone in retail IT has legacy systems. There’s a reason they hang around so long, and it’s not because they’re much loved or the best that technology can offer. Mostly, it’s because no one wants to spend all that money to get something that might go south and that, at best, will take a long time to pay for itself.

That means Kramer and Blum are in something of an enviable position: They have gotten a green light to completely strip out and replace their company’s IT structure. They’ve gotten the budget and, late in the earnings presentation, their boss even teased when the replacement will be unveiled: At the next quarter’s earnings call, “we will then talk about our new technology platform, how we’re going to win with technology and become—I think—the leading retailer from a technology perspective,” Johnson said.

That sounds great. Then again, everything about JCPenney’s resurrection has sounded great. It’ll be a little easier to believe once things actually start working according to the promises.

And when it comes to replacing a completely, thoroughly, utterly rotten IT core that happens to be what a big retail chain still depends on—heck, what could go wrong with that?


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.