J.Crew, OfficeMax, Blackwell To Get Coal In Their Uptime Stockings

Written by Fred J. Aun
December 18th, 2008

‘Tis the season to be jolly. Unless you’re in charge of uptime at upscale retailer J.Crew’s Web site.

Having suffered outages during Cyber Monday, J.Crew again became unavailable—to at least some prospective customers—for an extended period on Wednesday (Dec. 17). In doing so, J.Crew’s site joined a group of Web properties that continued having a tough time this holiday season.

Perhaps the crew at J.Crew can take solace in knowing their counterparts at Sephora are in the same boat, as are those manning the store at On Monday (Dec. 15), the sites for both Sephora and Office Depot put on repeat performances of the unavailability issues they demonstrated earlier this month.

Sporadic outages were seen at other seemingly glitchy sites. Office Max, which went offline for a half-hour on December 5, went belly-up for a similar duration on Tuesday (Dec. 16). was unavailable on December 2, December 7 and December 14, with each outage lasting six or seven minutes. And CDW lived through a short outage, about 10 minutes, during the late night hours of December 12.

The nature of the outages were such that it was hard to determine causes, whether they were maintenance efforts, traffic hiccups or something else.

Online shoppers hoping to place an order with the site operated by Blackwell, one of the largest book chains in the United Kingdom, which ships more than 3 million books a year, were out of luck for much of December 10.

Site traffic monitoring firm Pingdom said’s problems began at 4:30 AM London time, with an outage that lasted for four hours and 15 minutes. Another crash hit at 2:50 PM and lasted 50 minutes. Then, at 5:10 PM, a third problem left the site unavailable for two more hours. Minor issues riddled the next day, said Pingdom, noting they only caused brief periods of unavailability.

Back in the United States, the U.S. Postal Service was dealing with a series of problems that plagued its popular Click-N-Ship service for several days. But at least the postal folk called some of their customers to apologize.

Over at J.Crew, though, no apologies were offered. For those who know the tortured history of J.Crew and its site launch this summer, perhaps avoiding an apology was wise. This time, the site advised visitors to “stay tuned” and added that “even the best sites aren’t perfect.”

True. But as far as uptime goes, it’s clear that some sites are less perfect than others.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.